User talk:David Cage of Quantic Dream

A beer for you!
Hello Mohammed. Have you let family watch Beyond: Two Souls yet?

Yes. They loved it. They say you are a excellent director. Bravo boss. Why do you have 2 account? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed Carlyle (talk • contribs) 21:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

I am not allowed to use other account because I threatened to sue Wikipedia for deleting all of our work. I will still sue Wikipedia if they do it again.


 * Again, stop threatening with legal action. Think about that for a second, Wikipedia is not yours to control, and with all these disclaimers everywhere, on what grounds will you be suing? That you don't like that people call Beyond a game? You do know that magazines and webseries and websites and shops and whatever you can think of call it a video game and not a move right?


 * If this is the actual account of the actual David Cage, he would be quite the fool: the Internet never forgets anything. What if a video game website picks this up? "David Cage threatens Wikipedia with legal action" or "David Cage doesn't understand Wikipedia" or "David Cage: Wikipedia dictator?".


 * So I don't think the real David Cage would do such a thing. And look, your brilliant conversation doesn't scream "professionalism" either.


 * It's great that you like Beyond so much, but please, just drop the charade. --Soetermans. T / C 12:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I am perfectly willing to believe that this is David Cage, that he sees his work as an interactive film, not a game, and that this is very important to him. I'm even open to the possibility that this work is better described as a film than a game, and if Cage would be willing to assist in showing that the best available sources define it in that way, I wouldn't have any problem with seeing the change made.  I don't know whether he is interested in working with other people, or in learning more about how Wikipedia works, in order to do that - he seems to think that, as the director, he should not have to work with other people or under a system of rules, so it might not be worth the effort to him.  I've seen many people in this position simply quit in disgust that Wikipedia has rules, and collaboration, and isn't really the free-for-all it's sometimes portrayed as in the media.  I'd even be willing to help him learn, if he wanted to, although I'm not on Wikipedia all that often, and he might be happier with someone who spends more time here.  If he wanted to be active on Wikipedia, and use this username, we'd have to confirm that this is really him, but there are many fairly simple ways to do that.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, David Cage of Quantic Dream, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Beyond Two Souls
I noticed that you are involved with a disagreement over this article, and that you are changing the article to say that this is not a game, but a movie. However, the image seems to clearly show a game. Are you certain your facts are correct? Wikipedia requires that all information be verifiable in reliable sources - if you'll take a moment to remove the information that you know in other ways, and leave only the information that is in the current printed sources, citing those sources, you should be able to solve your disagreement. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Your block
I think you may have misunderstood the terms under which you were blocked. You, the human being, were blocked from using Wikipedia until the problem that made the block necessary is solved - it doesn't solve the problem for you to create a new account. If you've carefully read and understood the rules, and if you've decided to unconditionally withdraw your legal threat, just go back to your original account and request unblocking, clearly explaining your withdrawal of the legal threat and what you will do differently in the future. Thanks ! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)