User talk:David Dylan

Welcome!
Hello, David Dylan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Xx236 (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

David Dylan, you are invited to the Teahouse!
(David Dylan (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)) I already have lots of experience from being an IP user. Thank you. It might be useful someday (David Dylan (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC))

MfD nomination of Template:User child
Template:User child, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User child and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:User child during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~ Rob 13 Talk 18:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC) (David Dylan (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)) For those reasons, I have erased the template to a blank page (David Dylan (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)) (David Dylan (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)) You are free to delete the (now) blank page. I did not think of those concerns(David Dylan (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC))

Stubs
I have added some stubs that I've been working on, you can help by contributing. Here are some stubs. Port of Key West, and Port of St. Andrews David Dylan (talk) 02:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Euclayptus notabilis


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Euclayptus notabilis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Smjg (talk) 22:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:CUZ


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:CUZ, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Marvellous Spider-Man  04:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Kaskaskia-Cahokia Trail
Please quote reliable sources. It's one of the shortest pages in this Wikipedia, is the subject really notable?Xx236 (talk) 07:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC) (David Dylan (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)) It now has a lot of info and references. (David Dylan (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC))

January 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kaskaskia–Cahokia Trail, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Deicey (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC) (David Dylan (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC))It added info about history. It was constructive. Look at the edit history(David Dylan (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)) My apologies, I didn't look through the history very well.

Apologies
I'm sorry for the unneeded reversion on the article you are editing. I did not think to check the history and jumped to a conclusion before anything else. Deicey (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Pullen Pullen


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Pullen Pullen. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pullen Pullen Reserve. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pullen Pullen Reserve – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Meiloorun  (talk) 🍁 00:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaskaskia–Cahokia Trail


A tag has been placed on Kaskaskia–Cahokia Trail requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://monroecountynews.net/county-designates-kaskaskia-cahokia-trail/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)) the copyvios have been removed (David Dylan (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC))

Rajapruk University
Removing copyright violations takes more than what you have done. That is an overly-close paraphrasing. You need to completely rewrite it in your own words.Meters (talk) 03:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajapruk University, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Stop removing the speedy. Let an admin look at it and decide. You appear to have no idea how to fix the article properly so I suggest that you leave it alone. `Meters (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just stop. Changing the order of words does not help. Meters (talk) 04:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 04:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)) What do you expect I do to get rid of the close paraphrasing (David Dylan (talk) 04:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC))


 * Many of your changes are ungrammatical, have changed the meaning of the original, or are so badly written that I would have undone the edits if it wouldn't have restored the original copyvio. I'm sorry to have to say this, but it appears to me that your English writing skills are not sufficient to rewrite this article properly. Meters (talk) 04:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 04:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)) What is Close Paraphrasing. I need to know the problem.(David Dylan (talk) 04:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC))


 * See WP:PARAPHRASE Meters (talk) 04:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I really think you should just leave this alone. What you are writing either makes no sense, or does not remove the copyvio issue. You are wasting your time. Meters (talk) 04:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)) Then let it be so. I am handing this inclusionary task to other editors (David Dylan (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC))


 * We need to write a completely new article about the school, one that's not based on simply tweaking the copy of the school's webpage. Meters (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)) So why don't you already do that. Are you still asleep. (David Dylan (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC))

January 2017
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lions Save Sight Foundation, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Samtar talk &middot; contribs 16:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)) I fell asleep before I could add any referenced data. See WP:BITE (David Dylan (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC))
 * You're very familiar with our policies for a two week old account - have you ever used any other Wikipedia accounts? The above one, however, doesn't really apply when you've had the issue explained to you multiple times -- Samtar talk &middot; contribs 16:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, ! Please stop removing speedy deletion tags for copyrighted material until the copyright violation is actually remedied. Simply changing the order of the words so that it doesn't trigger the copyvio detector does not solve this problem. Cheers! Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)) A page is made over multiple edits. I will start using the notepad to build pages over one edit. (David Dylan (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC))
 * I am honestly not sure what you are trying to say but the issue here is not multiple edits, its the removal of copyright violation notification and tags when the copyright violation itself was not dealt with. Changing the order of words does not solve this issue. Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC))I was talking to samsar. (David Dylan (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC))

(David Dylan (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)) I created that page with the intent of adding more content today. (David Dylan (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC))


 * For the love of kittens, please just sign the end of your comments (with four tildes, like this: ~ ). Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You can also indent your replies using one or more  characters at the beginning of the line, depending on how far it needs to be indented. It's hard to follow your comments if you do not sign and indent in the usual manner. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 16:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Please don't assess speedy deletions
Hi David Dylan and thanks for the work you do here. I have a request: Please don't assess speedy deletions, like you did at Driver's licenses in Trinidad and Tobago. Please leave this job to administrators familiar with dealing with copyright violations so that (1) the article can be properly and promptly cleaned and (2) revision deletion of the page history can be done. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please don't add links in the "See also" section that have already been used. See MOS:NOTSEEALSO. Meters (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok.(David Dylan (talk) 00:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC))

This is getting disruptive. Don't just go in and start changing things without understanding what you are doing. This time I had to undo a link you added to Starbucks. Kevin Johnson is not involved with Starbucks=. He is a politician and a former basketball player. Kevin Johnson (executive) is who we want to link to. If you can't be bothered to actually look at what you are linking then don't do it all. Meters (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

I will learn from those mistakes, then.(David Dylan (talk) 00:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC))

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Your addition to Lake Le-Aqua-Na State Recreation Area has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Improve SuggestBot then. I didn't even know about that page. SuggestBot brought me to that page. I added a basic list, and I made it as free of copyvios as possible in Notepad. (David Dylan (talk) 13:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC))

You don't fire me, I quit.
I guess I will become a WikiGnome. I seem like I've been making way too much mistakes for content creation. At this rate, I will be blocked from editing. Becoming a WikiGnome is my way of saying "Why am I such a misfit. Why am I such a misfit. You don't fire me, I quit. That's the way I will fit!". You scared me away from content creation. David Dylan (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, I am Zppix an editor who just happened to see this in recent changes, and I've looked at your user talk and I want to respectfully give you some advice. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE OFFENSE.

If you have any questions don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 14:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC) I noticed this ping and I have a solution. Become a WikiGnome. That's the solution. David Dylan (talk) 14:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Do not remove Speedy Deletion tags unless, you added it and it was by mistake, you have a VALID reason behind removing it. AND for the love of Jimbo don't remove it if you created the page.
 * PLEASE read up on Wikipedia policies, and ask questions if you have them, many Wikipedians will be more then happily help you out!
 * DO NOT determine whether or not speedy deletion tags are valid or not (excluding the criterion included above)
 * PLEASE do not sign the beginning of your messages on talk pages only the end using ~
 * Do not be uncivil towards others
 * Finally, DO NOT BE DISRUPTIVE OR VANDALISE (even if you haven't before this is just something i must emphasise), You will be caught and it will be reverted if you attempt it (this is not an attack FYIT just stating facts read my warning above this list)
 * I understand you being upset with Meters, but David, if you wish can you try this atleast, start with what you know you can do right and slowly making more difficult edits, I'm sure and  understand no-one's perfect, we all make mistakes. I'm willing to mentor you and help you out to best of my ability and I'm sure I could work something out with those aforementioned editors to give you a second (but monitored) chance, you seem like an editor that does stuff in good-faith and i see some potential, but I also can see that you may need some help. Let me know I'll be around. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 14:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Dylan (talk • contribs) 14:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Do you think that any constructive changes can occur on any of these articles

Articles that I will edit first, at the top

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

(David Dylan (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC))


 * I'm not trying to be uncivil to User:David Dylan or to chase him away, and I agree that this is not a case of bad faith editing. but he really does not seem to get the copyright issue. This is becoming a WP:CIR issue. He cannot copy material verbatim. He cannot simply change the order of a few words and claim that he has addressed the copyright issue. He cannot simply change a few words and claim that he has addressed the copyright issues. There have been multiple incidents pointed out by several editors, and yet he continues. Meters (talk) 20:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Remember the title of this page....... If you keep on harassing me every time that I make a mistake, I will give up on content creation, and become a WikiGnome, so I won't make mistakes. In fact, I already gave up. D∆VID DYLAN (talk) 20:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Meters, I never accused you of being uncivil (sorry if i gave you that impression), David do you truly not understand the copyright problem that Meter's mentioned if not, ask for help understanding, I or someone else would be glad to put it into different wording that is easier for you to understand (we understand that not everyone can understand certain words even if they are native speakers of English), if you are wanting to become a wikignome i'd be glad to show you the ropes as well. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't think you had, Zppix. That was more in response to David Dylan's suggestion that I was biting a new comer. Now that he's calling it harassment I'm done making suggestions to help him. I'll stay off this page unless I template him or report him to ANI, Meters (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

I do not understand the copyvio problem, as Wikipedia is full of lists, and Wikipedia has to be verifiable, when I place sourced lists on Wikipedia, the lists are removed because of copyvios; giving a free pass only to unverifiable lists. '''Wikipedia must be verifiable, with lists as no exeption. Lists are part of Wikipedia, so why did, out of the necessity for verifiability, verifiable lists get deleted, because their verifiability triggers the Earwig Copyvio Detector''' (David Dylan (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC))
 * First off copyvio is not verifiable you must use the references you get the info from and write it completely in your own words meaning if a references said "Bob ate an Western Pumpkin Pie" you wouldnt use that you would instead say "The Western Pumpkin Pie was eaten by Bob." Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 01:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

So how does that play into making a decent list. (David Dylan (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC))
 * Please read WP:LIST --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 01:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

That didn't show the copyright implications for lists. The fact that it is impossible to reword a list can be interpreted as a copyvio, as the proper nouns that make up the list cannot be reworded. And it has. Try rewording "Massachusetts" and stating it in your own words. Most lists are made completely out of proper nouns.

No, because it was you that said that my mistake on Starbucks was disruptive/test/vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Dylan (talk • contribs) 23:00, January 18, 2017 (UTC)


 * Don't ping me. I've said I will stay off your page. I will not respond to any further threads or pings.
 * As for this one, I did not call it vandalism. I did not call it a test. I did not template you. I did not pipe it to WP:G2. I said "This is getting disruptive." and here's the proof: You added that pipe to G2 to my post. And here's the proof of that:  Meters (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I've offered to mentor you, but immediately doing this afterwards is unacceptable, I'm sorry David but everyone has to follow the policies around here. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 00:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

OK. (David Dylan (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC))

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at East-West Corridor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The source you added did not support the claims. Please don't add random inline links. Meters (talk) 06:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Then ask the administrator of SuggestBot to not add any unreferenced sites that have no supporting web.
 * , Meters has said over and over he will not post to your talk page unless its to template you or required by policy or a Wikipedia process (such as AfD), and don't blame SuggestBot for your editing habits. You are the one who clicked save changes, your the one whom typed your edit in the edit window. The bot did nothing but suggest articles based on YOUR contributions. I suggest you read up on policies and editing guidelines before I start considering WP:CIR to be in affect towards you (and yes, I'm even trying to assume Good Faith.)

Stop pinging meters has he has previously asked. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 13:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Signing your posts
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your addition to Nashua, Acton & Boston Railroad has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You are going to get yourself blocked if you keep copying material from the web onto Wikipedia. Stop doing that. Meters (talk) 00:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nashua, Acton & Boston Railroad. Repeated copyright violation. Once again, that is WP:PARAPHRASE. You cannot simple change a few words of text you copy from the web and say that it is not a copyright violation. Meters (talk) 04:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

What? I saw that most of the content was reworded. Did you send this a long time ago and I just got it. But please feel free to do revision deletion. Also feel free to reword the content yourself, if you think I did a sloppy job. Thanks. (David Dylan (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC))

Nashua, Acton & Boston Railroad
After removing the almost verbatim copyvio and excessively close paraphrasing there is virtually nothing left of this article. Meters (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've removed my A7 request. The claim that it existed is a credible claim of significance. Note that that is not the same as showing that it is notable. You still need to add reliable sources to show its notability. And the ref you currently have, NERAIL, is just an internet mailing list and is not a reliable source. See WP:RS, particularly WP:USERGENERATED. Meters (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Please revert your contribution to Nashua, Acton and Boston Railroad, as you should not cencor encyclopedic content. Please then reword it in your own words. Thanks.

Proposed deletion of Nashua, Acton & Boston Railroad


The article Nashua, Acton & Boston Railroad has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Several dozen revisions worth of copyvio/heavy paraphrasing and purpose of article is not entirely clear. Perhaps WP:BLOWITUP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  00:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
I'm sorry to inform you, but I have indefinitely blocked your account. The continual addition of copyright content from external websites continues to be a significant problem which you are continually failing to remedy. I appreciate you continue to try and reword content, changing a word here or there, but the core content you copy remains so substantially similar that the original copyright continues to exist.

When you write content on Wikipedia, you must write that content, from the ground up, using your own sentences and paragraphs, not just changing a word or two. If you are writing content properly, you should really be merging content from multiple sources into one completely new piece of text, which has few if any similarities to any of the original sources you have used whilst researching a subject.

I hope that you can read our policies on copyright, close paraphrasing and the like thoroughly. The block, whilst indefinite, can be lifted and you can resume editing when we are happy you are no longer a plagiarism concern for Wikipedia. Nick (talk) 00:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi nick. I want to inform you that I am a child. I know what my mistake is now. I should focus on rewording SENTENCES, not WORDS. If this valid. Could you give me a second chance. Could you teach me a tad more policy. Could you unblock me? David Dylan (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

I experience time different from you. David Dylan (talk) 00:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

I have read up on those policies. David Dylan (talk) 00:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Do you hear me. David Dylan (talk) 00:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Do you understand that, with the exception of most drug dealers, when people are punished, they don't want to be punished again. I was only asking for a userspace page where I can easily PROPOSE edits to pages. Also, I was trying to be steered in the right direction when Zppix talk offered to mentor me. Then he was gone. David Dylan (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The proof is right here David Dylan (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * David, Don't tell only parts of the story, I offered to mentor you until you decided to then backstab me, now 's block is pretty valid, you were told to stop, by many others. Now, do yourself a favor and  STOP  digging a deeper hole. I tried to prevent this but you completely disregarded my help, this is no-ones fault but your own. I'm sorry I've tried to AGF but with this continued behavior I cannot anymore. I suggest reading every policy and guideline and come back again and try to ask for a unblock in a few months/years explaining what you did wrong and what you will do to stop the behavior, and hope an admin will if they feel its the right thing to do, unblock you. While I do believe that your first couple times were in fact in good faith the fact you continued shows to many editors a sign of bad faith towards Wikipedia. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

I used actual effort to remove those copyvios. Also, I was trying to propose edits in users pace, not directly edit them David Dylan (talk) 14:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I wanted a survey on my editing behavior, not full unblock. David Dylan (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I used thesaurus substitutions not knowing that was incorrect. David Dylan (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

That's what I did wrong. David Dylan (talk) 14:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

But anyway, I know what I did to deserve the punishment. Thanks for giving me a time out. Now I know what the problem. David Dylan (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Was. Sorry for the mumbling. David Dylan (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:MINORS, and also note age doesnt mean anything in punishment Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 17:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I see time different. David Dylan (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I feel punished enough to not do it again. Also you said a few months/years. David Dylan (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I have read up on libel. David Dylan (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I have read up on changing username policy. David Dylan (talk) 18:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Really... its still the same exact week I posted that comment... I really just suggest just accepting what we all been saying and move on with life, I don't care if your 55 or 2 months old, everyone is given the same punishments. I'm not an admin by any means, but I can tell you this, I cannot see an admin unblocking you anytime this month. Now please move on. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I refuse to help anyone. I refuse to use computers. I refuse to use the web. I refuse to use Wikipedia. You'll ask me to get a life on Google+. I will tell you that I should have been unblocked. David Dylan (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

STiki, another anti vandalism tool listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect STiki, another anti vandalism tool. Since you had some involvement with the STiki, another anti vandalism tool redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Avic ennasis @ 22:33, 9 Shevat 5777 / 22:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Twinkle, another anti vandalism tool listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Twinkle, another anti vandalism tool. Since you had some involvement with the Twinkle, another anti vandalism tool redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Avic ennasis @ 22:35, 9 Shevat 5777 / 22:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)