User talk:David G Music

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "I will only write things that are that are encylopedic" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:I am music manager I do not get paid for contributions to Wiki.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Blocked for sockpuppetry
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/David G Music. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 11:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Here is what your head office said
Hi David,

Generally it is best to wait for other people to decide to write about content like this. Otherwise there is a strong conflict of interest. Especially in the case of commercial content. I will also recommend that you read through the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources policy page, to better understand what makes a reference "reliable" in the sense within that term is used by Wikipedia editors. E.g. blogs, press releases and many of the other google search results are not considered reliable. The Telegraph article might be, although that is more about the circumstances around the recording than the recording itself. However, adding that or any link should still be left up to the uninvolved editors. For more policy-links and perspectives, I will point towards #4 in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOTPRESSRELEASE

I hope that information helps. Sincerely, Nick Wilson I am very happy to accept this I will not add anything that contravenes the rules David G Music (talk) 17:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)