User talk:David Jonion

November 2023
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to William J. Burns (diplomat) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Ingenuity, your edit does not seem constructive to me either. Can you please update the page again? William J. Burns is indeed missing and it seems he made a secret trip to Cameroun.
 * https://actucameroun.com/2023/10/10/william-joseph-burns-le-patron-de-la-cia-effectue-un-voyage-secret-au-cameroun/ David Jonion (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I have reverted your change as it had a broken link. Please have a look at the guide for citing sources linked in the Welcome post below. Tacyarg (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Tacyarg! I'll fix the link anon. David Jonion (talk) 21:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on William_J._Burns_(diplomat). ''First you accuse me of being the subject, then you say I was banned. Both are lies. You are removed sourced content and edit warring. Stop it. Softlem'' (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William J. Burns (diplomat). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Softlemonades has been unbanned, and stating someone has been Deputy Sec of State isn't POV. ChaotıċEnby ( talk ) 21:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Please mind Wikipedia's policy against conflict of interest, self-editing, and spamming user pages. David Jonion (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, I don't have a conflict of interest regarding this article, and I am not self-editing. I don't believe I have spammed your Talk page, but have tried to link you to useful information. Tacyarg (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi David Jonion! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of William J. Burns (diplomat) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, David Jonion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page William J. Burns (diplomat) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome. Tacyarg (talk) 20:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Softlem (talk) 11:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)