User talk:David McGimpsey

March 2018
Hello, I'm Vermont. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to David McGimpsey— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Vermont &#124; reply here  00:09, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David McGimpsey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Vermont &#124; reply here  00:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, David McGimpsey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Vermont &#124; reply here  00:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia.  Vermont &#124; reply here  01:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at David McGimpsey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Please note that one of the sources cited in the text you removed is the CBC. That is a major, reputable news organization; they do not engage in "tabloid journalism". Accordingly, you do not qualify for an exemption to the three-revert rule related to a biography of a living person. —C.Fred (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, David McGimpsey, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username. If you choose to do so, we ask the following:
 * Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
 * Please send an email to info-en[[Image:At sign.svg|15px|@]]wikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles email is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).'''

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

contentious content
I've reverted to remove the content till this can be sorted. Biographies of living persons/Help probably has information to help you find your way forward. You should probably raise your concerns at WP:BLPN. Also, you could mention them in the email to the Foundation in which you establish your bona fides. Sorry for the aggravation.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 03:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)