User talk:David Newton

David, I don't know how to reach you via your user page here, why don't they have an email link? Anyway I am looking for more information on the USS Ticonderoga, specifically anything around the Kamikazee attacks in Jan 1945 in which my uncle was killed. Can you point me to some good sources? - ksmiley@kc.rr.com Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.4.193.228 (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello there David, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style.

Experiment at Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Angela 12:42 15 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Hey David :)
I have created a new navbox example that could be used instead of the Alphabetical and List of Ships infoboxes. What do you think?

Kind Regards

MiniEntente

Archive 1 - Archive 2 - Archive 3 - Archive 4

Very good work
Yes, I too have found that people are quite ignorant when it comes to lesser known military items. I have also seen how so many have no understanding of copyright and read sections that have been just lifted from books - with NO reference to them. Shameful. Well, that’s our job, I guess - to clean up and make it credit worthy.

On seeing your interests, I have know doubt our paths will cross again. If I can help on anything - RAF related that is - then let me know. --Rafbuffeditor 09:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Template:Ship fate table fate
Hi, I just noticed that a template you created, Template:Ship fate table fate, is unused and appears to be abandoned. I've marked it as deprecated, meaning it'll be deleted in two weeks' time if nobody objects. If there's a reason to keep it please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Deprecated and orphaned templates and feel free to remove the deprecated tag from the template. Thanks. Bryan Derksen 03:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Gettysburg Confederate Order of Battle
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gettysburg Confederate Order of Battle, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gettysburg Confederate Order of Battle is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gettysburg Confederate Order of Battle, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox UK Legislation
Good work on this David. We need to get this into use. I have added some comments on the template talk page but will not attempt to edit is as aesthetics are not my strong point.Cutler 09:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * An open question/suggestion for you and Cutler: Shouldn't Template:UK legislation and Template:British legislation lists, Acts be merged? – Swid (talk · edits) 05:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Template:Ship test depth
A you created, Template:Ship test depth,  been marked for deletion as  deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the  tag from the template. If you feel the deletion appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually, looking through User:Woohookitty/S, there appears to be a whole bunch of similar ship templates you created back in 2005 that are now completely orphaned. Can I clear them out en masse? Naturally I'll only delete the ones that are unused, I figure skipping the deprecated step makes sense in cases of large groups like this. Bryan Derksen (talk) 10:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Question about a possible typo
I found what may be a typographical error in USS Vestal (AR-4): I suspect "dp" in the above quote should actually be "do", but I am not entirely sure. WikiBlame identified the first revision in which this passage appears. Since that revision lists you as the author, could you check that quote for correctness? Thank you. --Teratornis (talk) 06:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * "One has to be something of an artificer," her commanding officer recounted, ". . . to realize the problems that came up to dp with this job, such as underwater welding and cutting, which was still a fairly new thing."

infobox ship
David, The info box on RMS Queen Mary 2 has this error Career |60px   could you please have a look to see if possible to fix/remove. Thanks. Palmiped 17:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Doctorate
Wiki Doctorate is a new scheme designed to recognise the people who "do all the work" on Wikipedia. It has been mainly developed for Wikipedia administrators however if you have done lots to keep Wikipedia on "the straight and narrow", including being members of different groups which help Wikipedia i.e "The Welcoming Committee. We have selected to email you because you can apply for the doctorate and we would be very grateful if you did and put the userbox on your user page to boost advertising. The following link will take you straight to our homepage.

Yours sincerely

--Dr.J.Wright MD (talk) 23:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Copyvio on The Baptist Union of Scotland
Hi David – perhaps I'm just being slow here, but I'm working through the backlog at WP:ABL and I can't see the copyright violation on the above linked article. There's no resemblance between our stub and the external page, as far as I can tell. Your comment would be appreciated. Cheers &mdash;αlεx•mullεr 18:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

UK Legislation Infobox
Good work on this David! Did you use  rather than to shrink the text for any particular reason? I have picked up User:Swid's point at Template talk:UK legislation.Cutler (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Not every Act of Parliament is notable (though I think that most are). It makes sense to me to:


 * Discuss some Acts within the context of more notable Acts. For example, I have just written Wills Act 1837 and it seems sensible to put a brief discussion of the Wills (Soldiers and Sailors) Act 1918 in the same article.
 * Wrap up the minor Acts for a year into a Minor Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom in 2008 article - like the List of recurring characters from The Simpsons article (sort of)
 * Now I would also like to include all the important info on each Act as per the Infobox but that leads to a huge column down the right. The answer would be to have a mini-version of the Infobox that could be hidden/ autocollapsed like a NavBox. Any ideas how to do this?Cutler (talk) 12:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Done it - test soon.Cutler (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * OK,  it is then. I had had a quick look and thought that they came out the same but if   is shorter it is definitely superior.Cutler (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

You've reverted the changes I made to the way the infobox shows delegated legislation. I would submit that the changes I made were correct. "Statutory Rules and Orders" is a misleading heading - these days there are only Statutory Rules in N Ireland. In the rest of the UK its Statutory Instruments, which replaced Statutory Rules in 1948. Indeed, the page List of Statutory Rules and Orders of the United Kingdom only covers rules up to 1947. Therefore I think the general heading of Delegated Legislation is correct as it covers both the former Rules and the current Instruments, which should be subheadings. (I've no problem with the capitalisation etc changes you made). Dmvward (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Indian Army
Please see Talk:British Divisions in World War II --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 10:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 9th Carrier Air Group
A tag has been placed on 9th Carrier Air Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  LegoTech &middot;(t)&middot;(c) 14:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 9th Carrier Air Group
I have nominated 9th Carrier Air Group, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/9th Carrier Air Group. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  LegoTech &middot;(t)&middot;(c) 16:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

US Army Transport Vessels
I noticed that you started a list on US Army transport vessels. Do you have any source material on a 150 foot transport vessel, General Frank M. Coxe, which was built in 1922 and decommissioned in about 1947? It was used to transport personnel around San Francisco Bay with scheduled service from Fort Mason to Fort McDowell (Angel Island), and provided some services to Alcatraz during and before federal prison period. It was later converted to a luxury tour ferry and finally to a floating restaurant. After sitting as vacant hulk for 20 years, it was recently restored as a restaurant. I'm working on an article and would appreciate any ideas or sources. Thanks! --Kevin Murray (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I went ahead with General Frank M. Coxe (ship) as a start. I'd appreciate your feedback.  Should we add it to the list of list on US Army transport vessels? --Kevin Murray (talk) 04:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Support of User:Enforcer
I write in support of the user named above in this statement. I too have serious doubts about the legality of any of Wikipedia's activities under my own home state's laws (it's New York, horse racing central in the late summer). I'm not sure they're registered as required by the New York Non Profit Organizations laws. I'll enquire of this to the Attorney General of New York, Andrew Cuomo. And as to Mr. Wales not being a public figure, you're wrong. He's been in the media many times so now he has no protections of a private citizen if Enforcer chooses to sue in Florida. An NY Supreme Court justice would dismiss his countersuit in an instant if it was filed here. I'd like your opinion in this matter. 68.236.154.131 (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Royal Navy ships
Category:Royal Navy ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:Ship table box aircraft yes
A template you created, Template:Ship table box aircraft yes, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the   tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 01:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of template
Your (apparent) sandbox page User:David_Newton/New_Format_Ship_Tables/Prototype_tables contained a link to the template Template:Ship capacity box none which was otherwise orphaned and has been deleted. If you are still using your your prototype page, you should fix this. If you want the page deleted, add db-u1 to the top of the page. --Selket Talk 17:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Military bases
Category:Military bases, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:C-46-commando.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:C-46-commando.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wakkubox (talk) 11:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of convoy codes
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of convoy codes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Superm401 - Talk 02:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

cp?
Please excuse my appaling ignorance (and spelling); on Admiral of the Fleet (Royal Navy) you placed the edit summary "(→Admirals of the Fleet: cp)". Could I bother you to tell me what "cp" means? Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 22:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Architects Act 1997
David I've removed a link that you posted on this page (UK Statutes database) because, as yet, they have not updated it. You might like to take a look. Salisian (talk) 11:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

BBC documentary
Dear Mr Newton

I recently came across one of your postings. Might you be able to get in touch?

Thanks

Stephen

Stephen Bennett Producer/ Director

Clarity Productions www.producingclarity.com

T: +44 (0)141 221 8821 E: stephen@producingclarity.com

86.161.227.88 (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

RFA Wave Laird (A119)
I see that you created this article back in 2004. I've reworked it but it needs improvement to the referencing. Can you assist in providing refs where indicated please? Mjroots (talk) 11:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

USS Ticonderoga
David, can you point me to more sources of information on the USS Ticonderoga, specifically the kamikaze attacks of Jan 1945 that damaged the ship and killed my uncle. Please forward any info to or contact me at ksmiley@kc.rr.com apologies in advance if I am not contacting you in the right way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.4.193.228 (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

List of acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom
I'd appreciate your input regarding whether the above list should be at List of acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom or List of Acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom. See Talk:List of acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Hiding T 12:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Hms-devonshore-d02.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hms-devonshore-d02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Japanese.aircraft.carrier.hiryu.jpg
File:Japanese.aircraft.carrier.hiryu.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Japanese aircraft carrier hiryu.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg is now available as Commons:File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ship notes table yes
A tag has been placed on Template:Ship notes table yes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

wtf is it used for?, is it even being used?

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:C-87-liberator-express.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Ship decommission templates
This family of templates was created in 2005. When I click "What links here", none of them are linked from anywhere except from each other. Does that mean they aren't used, and does that mean they should be deleted? Art LaPella (talk) 05:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 14th Carrier Air Group


The article 14th Carrier Air Group has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.TrustWorthy Got Something to Tell Me? 13:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 14th Carrier Air Group
A tag has been placed on 14th Carrier Air Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr.TrustWorthy Got Something to Tell Me? 02:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox Ship test
A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Ship test requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  00:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Archer class fast patrol boat
Template:Archer class fast patrol boat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 05:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

List of Fleet Air Arm carrier air groups
Would you mind adding some references to this article? Buckshot06(prof) 05:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ship_range_table_yes (and a few others)
Template:Ship_range_table_yes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. TB (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Article naming - HMS Belfast
Hi David. I am starting a GA review of HMS Belfast (C35), and I noted that the title has disambiguation brackets (C35) even though we only have the one article on a HMS Belfast, and that HMS Belfast redirects to HMS Belfast (C35). The disambiguation brackets are not needed, are slightly problematic, so that, for example, the find}} template has to be adjusted, as a search for "HMS Belfast (C35)" produces incorrect results, and are against the guidelines given in [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions. I don't wish to restore the title to HMS Belfast, without passing it by you first. I am also notifying WikiProject Ships. Regards  SilkTork  *YES! 12:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Looking at the ship's website amongst other things it does appear that HMS Belfast was the first ship of that name in the RN and there have (so far) not been any other vessels with the name since it decommissioned. Consequently according to the Wikipedia naming conventions you are perfectly correct. David Newton (talk) 07:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hms-london-d16.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hms-london-d16.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RAF lists
Template:RAF lists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Greenshed (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

File:F3d-skynight.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:F3d-skynight.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Barbel class submarine
Template:Barbel class submarine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of British Armies in World War II


The article List of British Armies in World War II has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does this super super super short list even surve any purpose?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PD-old-50
Template:PD-old-50 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Ship test depth box Invincible class aircraft carrier


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 02:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Ship test depth box


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 02:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Ship test depth table yes


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 02:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:PD-flag-50 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:PD-flag-50. Since you had some involvement with the Template:PD-flag-50 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kelly hi! 05:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:PD-flag-100 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:PD-flag-100. Since you had some involvement with the Template:PD-flag-100 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kelly hi! 05:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Russian republics
Template:Russian republics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 22:22, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Russian oblasts
Template:Russian oblasts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 22:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

RAF Bomber Command
Hi! I see you've created the voice... please, could you read this post? Maybe you can help me... thank you.

p.s. I know some english users usually answers in their talk page, but I'm not used to do that (I'm italian - sorry for my english) so, please, answer in my talk. Thank you. --Bonty90 (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PD-art-US
Template:PD-art-US has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PD-art-life-70
Template:PD-art-life-70 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Updating your British Twelth Army Article
I've started updating the article you created to include details on the Phantom Army created by Operations Barclay & Cascade. I'd like to invite you to join me in improving your part of the articleGraham1973 (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Hi David,

Sorry to contact you like this, I'm looking for any information on Flight 1432 RAF, I know little about them other than they were in Nigeria around 1942 (from some photos) and wondered if you could point me in the direction of any sources?

Thanks

Klaynos —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klaynos (talk • contribs) 16:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

template Vanguard class submarine armament
I have put the contents of the template into the articles it was used in and nominated the template for deletion. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ship aircraft box Arleigh Burke class destroyer I
Template:Ship aircraft box Arleigh Burke class destroyer I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Project to encourage cooperation between The National Archives and Wikipedia
Hi! As someone who's spent some time at Your Archives, I thought you might be interested - if you haven't seen it already - in a GLAM project to encourage cooperation between The National Archives and Wikipedia. Participation welcome! Dsp13 (talk) 19:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Templates nominated for deletion
The following templates have been nominated for deletion at: Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_23

Rich Farmbrough, 00:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC).



Frietjes (talk) 20:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Draught


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine EW
Template:Vanguard class submarine EW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine beam
Template:Vanguard class submarine beam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine complement
Template:Vanguard class submarine complement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine displacement
Template:Vanguard class submarine displacement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine draught
Template:Vanguard class submarine draught has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine length
Template:Vanguard class submarine length has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine propulsion
Template:Vanguard class submarine propulsion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine sensors
Template:Vanguard class submarine sensors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanguard class submarine speed
Template:Vanguard class submarine speed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary
Wishing David Newton a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 00:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Athletics at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metres
Best wishes Victuallers (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Japanese.aircraft.carrier.kaga.jpg
 * File:Emi Koussi.JPG
 * File:Free-French-Ensign.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox UK Statutory Instrument
Template:Infobox UK Statutory Instrument has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox UK legislation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Alakzi (talk) 02:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 02:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Inactivity
Hi David Newton, due to your recent inactivity, I have now removed your sysop userright. Thank you for all your hard work WormTT(talk) 07:11, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nimitz class aircraft carrier armament I
Template:Nimitz class aircraft carrier armament I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hms-fife-d20.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hms-fife-d20.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chicopee class oiler
Template:Chicopee class oiler has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 13:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Queen Elizabeth class battleship beam
Template:Queen Elizabeth class battleship beam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Free-French-Ensign.png


The file File:Free-French-Ensign.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Low res duplicate of C:File:Naval Ensign of Free France.svg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

HMS Sceptre shooting down Zeppelin?
When you created the article HMS Sceptre (1917) back in the mists of 2004, you included the ststement that it shot down a Zeppelin in 1917. Do you know what source you used for this?Nigel Ish (talk) 08:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rover class tanker displacement
Template:Rover class tanker displacement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Queen Elizabeth class battleship armament
Template:Queen Elizabeth class battleship armament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Queen Elizabeth class battleship armour
Template:Queen Elizabeth class battleship armour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Trafalgar class submarine beam
Template:Trafalgar class submarine beam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rover class tanker aircraft
Template:Rover class tanker aircraft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cpl. Louis J. Hauge Jr. class dry cargo ship
Template:Cpl. Louis J. Hauge Jr. class dry cargo ship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier complement
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier complement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q𝟤𝟪 21:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier SCB125 beam
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier SCB125 beam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for USS Mindoro (CVE-120)
USS Mindoro (CVE-120) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier aircraft
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier aircraft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier armament
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier armament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier armour
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier armour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier beam
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier beam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier displacement
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier displacement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier draught
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier draught has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier length
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier length has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier propulsion
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier propulsion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier speed
Template:Ticonderoga class aircraft carrier speed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier aircraft
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier aircraft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier armament
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier armament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier armour
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier armour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier beam
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier beam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier complement
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier complement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier displacement
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier displacement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier draught
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier draught has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier length
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier length has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier propulsion
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier propulsion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier range
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier range has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier speed
Template:Essex-class aircraft carrier speed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Royal Navy bases


A tag has been placed on Category:Royal Navy bases indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 06:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)