User talk:David offci

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Controversial: The prophetic tradition is cited as a source for the oppression of women (July 16) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Controversial: The prophetic tradition is cited as a source for the oppression of women and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Controversial: The prophetic tradition is cited as a source for the oppression of women, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Controversial:_The_prophetic_tradition_is_cited_as_a_source_for_the_oppression_of_women Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mcmatter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Controversial:_The_prophetic_tradition_is_cited_as_a_source_for_the_oppression_of_women reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Controversial: The prophetic tradition is cited as a source for the oppression of women
Hello, David offci. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Controversial: The prophetic tradition is cited as a source for the oppression of women, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Controversial: The prophetic tradition is cited as a source for the oppression of women


Hello, David offci. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Controversial: The prophetic tradition is cited as a source for the oppression of women".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:David offci


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:David offci requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User:David offci. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. The page was like someone's CV/résumé, aimed at impressing the reader with how wonderful the person it was about is. JBW (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)