User talk:Davidbesnainou392

Speedy deletion nomination of Lone soldier center


A tag has been placed on Lone soldier center, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Lone soldier center
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Lone soldier center. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Lone soldier center. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Lone soldier center, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lone soldier center


A tag has been placed on Lone soldier center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kürbis (✔) 09:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Davidbesnainou392, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Kürbis (✔) 09:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Removing Speedy at Lone soldier center
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Lone soldier center. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Promotional editing
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Levin (soldier). While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Cleanup at Lone Soldier Center - still needs sources to avoid Deletion
Greetings, your article Lone Soldier Center dropped to WP:Uncategorized since you did not provide any WP:Categories to file it properly. I fixed that for you, and did some basic cleanup of format.

While the article is interesting, and a worthwhile topic, it has/had a lot of errors that could be fixed with just some basic reading about Wikipedia formatting and conventions, which would also spare you the apparent headache you had over the last few days with Deletion issues.

You must provide some WP:Reliable sources attesting the WP:Notability of this organisation, or the article is still subject to deletion. That means academic or journalistic sources, unaffiliated with the subject. So not the LSC website, a blog, Facebook, etc. but citations from a newspaper article, book about the Israeli military, etc. Ideally every fact in the article should be clearly verifiable at a footnoted source.

Please take a moment to read up on some of these basic policies, and find a few sources to substantiate at least some of the basic facts about the article. Note also that I had to fix some of the WP:Neutrality issues in the article; it's not neutral and encyclopedic to say "fell protecting Israel", while a simple "died in a mission to rescue an IDF paratrooper..." is factually correct and accurate while making no opinions.

Hope these ideas help you, and that you can make the necessary improvements to safeguard the LSC article. Feel free to ping me for suggestions on improving the article, and/or visit The Teahouse to meet other volunteer mentors. MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:46, 20 September 2012 (UTC)