User talk:Davidboom

Advertising
I reverted because they didn't add anything to the article, duplicating existing content with what appeared to be an advertisement. Then you reverted my revert, so I looked at the rest of your contributions, and saw that you created an account for the express purpose of advertising, which is not what Wikipedia is for. Thus I've broken my general rule and re-reverted your edit. Also I don't expect your page Rdx sports will survive - I'm not opposed to it existing but many will take exception and very likely will submit it for deletion. ··gracefool&#128172; 20:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like you're making the same advertisement and unhelpful edits on other articles without logging in. ··gracefool&#128172; 08:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Gym glvoes


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gym glvoes. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gym gloves. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gym gloves – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RDX INC


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on RDX INC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Eye snore  14:39, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Paid editing?
Just checking whether you are being paid to edit Wikipedia. If you are then you need to follow WP:Paid and the Terms of Use for this website.

You might wonder why I think you might be paid for this. A) It looks like you are a WP:Single purpose account and (per above) that you are inserting advertising (e.g. product lists) into the article. See WP:NOADS. We don't accept advertisements (paid or unpaid) on Wikipedia. Also an editor with RDX in his user name has edited the article.

Smallbones( smalltalk ) 18:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 18:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RDX Inc


A tag has been placed on RDX Inc, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Search engine optimization, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 07:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RDX Inc


A tag has been placed on RDX Inc, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 09:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at RDX Inc. Bazj (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with RDX Sports. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 09:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:DGG/Archive 119 Dec. 2016
User talk:DGG/Archive 119 Dec. 2016, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:DGG/Archive 119 Dec. 2016 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User talk:DGG/Archive 119 Dec. 2016 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Davidboom, you seem to have pasted your comment on the wrong page--I have moved it to User talk:DGG.  DGG ( talk ) 01:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. Note that has protected the page from recreation. I deleted your article because Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text was unsourced, and the references you did give were mainly press releases or similar
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You go into great detail about what you sell, but don't bother telling us any facts about the company. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If you work directly or indirectly for the company, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the company you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Your points have been duly noted. I will provide authentic sources that can confirm all facts and figures related to the brand with all the other details that you have mentioned and would rewrite the article in an un-advertising tone. Here, I would mention that I am in no way employed or hired by the brand. I am a combat sports enthusiast and blogger, I have recently decided to write about fighting brands that are underrated but provide great quality for money. And this is my first attempt, hence the mistakes. Rest assured I will rectify the mistakes and submit a much more thoroughly researched article with verifiable sources. Thank you.

October 2016


A request has been filed for the title of : requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our inclusion guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete it is considered disruptive and is grounds for blocking. Thank you.  DGG ( talk ) 21:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

I already told several time it is a company information, a leading company in combat sports and this should be on wikipedia.