User talk:Davidcmathis

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 19:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

John Piper
Why do you keep deleting "Reformed Baptist" from John Piper (theologian)? It is an accurate, uncontroversial, and helpful description to have in the lede. --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 18:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

To Flex: I don't think Reformed Baptist is the most helpful way to label John Piper. Yes, he is Reformed in his soteriology. And yes, he is a Baptist. But that does not mean that Reformed Baptist is the best category. I take Reformed Baptist, as I believe many others do, to have strong connections with ARBCA and the Founders Movement within the Southern Baptist Convention. John Piper is associated with neither of these groups. His church is officially connected to the Baptist General Conference--far from Reformed Baptist! Baptist is accurate; so is Reformed. Although neither of these--or the two together--do I find to be the best headline adjective for John Piper. Davidcmathis (talk) 14:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * See Talk:John_Piper_(theologian). --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 19:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)