User talk:Davide Buttau

Welcome Davide Buttau! Hello Davide Buttau. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Sm8900 (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sm8900&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی Sm8900 (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Antisemitism in Poland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 14:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Tarl N.. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Timeline of United States history (1970–1989), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Aside from the lack of citations, the timelines of the smurfs simply doesn't rise to the level of meaning to enter the U.S. History timeline. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 22:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, September 11 attacks, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Corruption in Syria moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Corruption in Syria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Ahmadiyya in Tanzania moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ahmadiyya in Tanzania, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ferrari penalty controversy
Hello, Davide Buttau,

Thank you for creating Ferrari penalty controversy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Please add references and inline citations to the article. It is best practice to do that before uploading the article to main space. Use MOS:CITE as a guide for adding references and citations"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 15:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ferrari penalty controversy


The article Ferrari penalty controversy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence that this is independently notable to the event (2019 Canadian Grand Prix) or that there is need for an article split for some other reason."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SSSB (talk) 16:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit summaries
You keep typing spam and nonsense edit summaries. Stop it. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 16:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ferrari penalty controversy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferrari penalty controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ferrari penalty controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SSSB (talk) 17:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)


 * just delete the page. Davide Buttau (talk) 13:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * That would have already happened if you had not blocked the PROD process. If you want this to be deleted, request speedy deletion as creator. Tvx1 13:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Can you please deleted the page already, please? Davide Buttau (talk) 14:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No I can’t. Only administrator can do that. I have explained above how you can properly request deletion yourself.Tvx1 11:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * well, tell the administrator to delete that page, please. Davide Buttau (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I've tagged the page for speedy deletion accordingly. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * then just block the page. Davide Buttau (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. ''You've already been repeatedly warned about this. If you don't stop this inappropriate behaviour, it will be reported.'' Paul_012 (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi - edit summaries are there for a purpose. Your edit summaries look like those used by vandals. Your edits don't appear to be vandalism, but using edit summaries like that draws attention to the edits, and will result in multiple editors looking at your contribs - that is a waste of our most valuable resource, our volunteers' time. Your summary doesn't have to be verbose, but it should be meaningful - 'add sidebar' would be sufficient. If you continue to type nonsense, your account may be blocked for disruption. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Since you ignored my warning above, and those left by multiple other editors, I've blocked this account. This is a short block, and if you agree to stop using nonsense edit summaries, I will lift it. If you resume doing so after the block expires, the next block may be indefinite. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  13:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:SIDEBAR: Navigation templates are particularly useful for a small, well-defined group of articles; revolutions obviously do not qualify, and sidebars are particularly intrusive navigation tool that should be used with care. Users will hardly navigate between unrelated revolutions from different periods. Should anyone want to do that, they can peruse Category:Revolutions. I reverted your recent edits adding Revolution sidebar to pretty much every article out there. No such user (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Girth Summit, it appears Davide Buttau insists on continuing with said behaviour following the block. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * hey girth summit, i'm sorry for that. can you please unblock me? Davide Buttau (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 21:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Ahmadiyya in Bahrain
Hello, Davide Buttau, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Red-tailed hawk, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ahmadiyya in Bahrain, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Ahmadiyya in Bahrain.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

"Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 17:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmadiyya in Tanzania
Hello, Davide Buttau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmadiyya in Tanzania, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)