User talk:Davidelloyd

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to The Unit. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo 16:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary and your personal analysis of an article into Wikipedia articles, as you did to Harrow School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Konstable 14:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Konstable 14:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to The Unit, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo 18:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Bomb
Your recent edit to Bomb (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 11:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism isn't cool
Just noticed your vandalism of the Daniel Agger article. It must have taken you a while to change all those details, whereas it only takes 3 clicks to revert it all. I see you've caused problems before, and so could soon end up with a ban from Wikipedia. I'd advise you not to vandalise anything more. aLii 09:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)