User talk:Davidfreesefan23

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome!

Hello, Davidfreesefan23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Malinaccier ( talk ) 05:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to December 21, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=468717151 here]. Glacialfox (talk) 04:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Penn State Nittany Lions football. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  03:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiffany Springs waterpark


A tag has been placed on Tiffany Springs waterpark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 04:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, page unavailable listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oops, sorry, page unavailable. Since you had some involvement with the Oops, sorry, page unavailable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).  N Y  Kevin  @878, i.e. 20:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, page unavailable listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oops, sorry, page unavailable. Since you had some involvement with the Oops, sorry, page unavailable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  16:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Duke (disambiguation), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=475987750 here]. Glacialfox (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Nebraska–Lincoln, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=477045053 here]. Glacialfox (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:
 Tide  rolls  19:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.   Ð ℬig XЯaɣ   12:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The edit wasn't a test edit. I was adding a bunch of hidden text in order to get administrators not to delete my article, which has been nominated for AfD. User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Comment on content not the motives of other editors please. Please remove or strike your last comment'' Mt  king  (edits)  22:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Mt  king  (edits)  23:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coen brothers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.  Ready ( talk  contributions ) 18:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game
WHY WAS MY ARTICLE DELETED???????? :(((((((((((((((((((((((((( User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Guidance
Hello. I believe you could use a little help and guidance to help understand a few of wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the useful template, below, to follow links to specifics that may help you to make more constructive edits in the future. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at User talk:Ready and I will assist you as best I can. Many thanks.  Ready ( talk  contributions ) 18:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * }

Kopyright
A tag has been placed on Kopyright, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 75.53.218.81 (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Juan Oviedo, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 18:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!
You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:

Proposed deletion of Dooors


The article Dooors has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lack of sources, no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mifter (talk) 00:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 100 Floors


The article 100 Floors has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lack of sources, no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mifter (talk) 00:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 100 Floors


A tag has been placed on 100 Floors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cyan  Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 01:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sblounskched!


The article Sblounskched! has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTABILITY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Sblounskched
A tag has been placed on Sblounskched, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baja Grill


A tag has been placed on Baja Grill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - MrX 04:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pietrisycamollaviadelrechiotemexity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pietrisycamollaviadelrechiotemexity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pietrisycamollaviadelrechiotemexity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is NOT a blog
Wikipedia is NOT a blog nor a place for your opinions. The following is NOT allowed on Wikipedia. • Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 02:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Kansas&diff=539578002&oldid=537965770

Speedy deletion nomination of Kardashian (unit)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kardashian (unit), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pam D  08:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Department of Fun/Word Association
Department of Fun/Word Association, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Department of Fun/Word Association during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.. Thryduulf (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Couch burning
Hello, Davidfreesefan23,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Couch burning should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Couch burning.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Steve9821 (talk) 03:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Looking at your edit history, it looks like you'd been editing productively for a while, but then you made this edit today to North Carolina State University. Since it's one-off, I'm not taking any action, but please, no opinions or personal accounts in articles. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of streets in Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulaski Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Thank you for your contributions&#32;to Repetition, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 08:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=556532823 your edit] to Kofe Khauz may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Speedy deletion nomination of Melborp


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Melborp, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Tentinator   22:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miami Heat, you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Dionne quintuplets. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''do not re-add the contested category without gaining consensus on the talk page. Your inability to provide a reliable source is indicative that your opinion does not carry enough weight to be included in the article. WP:BRD requires you to prove on the talk page that your edit should be in place. Just putting it back is considered edit warring and can lead to your being blocked from editing. '' noq (talk) 08:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dionne quintuplets, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''A random blog is not a reliable source. As stated previously you need reliable sources and to gain consensus on the articles talk page - not just reverting and shouting in the edit summaries. As this is your final warning, if you again revert without gaining consensus you are very likely to be blocked from editing until you decide to play by the rules.'' noq (talk) 06:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Haplology because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barry Bonds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for persistent disruptive editing. Some of your edits are the sort of things which might, coming from a new user, be innocent mistakes due to lack of understanding of Wikipedia, but you are way beyond that stage. Some of your edits seem to be infantile "jokes", but, whatever may or may not be acceptable in talk pages or Wikipeida-space pages, joke edits of publicly visible articles are unacceptable. However, even if we make the maximum possible allowance for those two categories of disruptive edits, we are still left with a significant number of edits which are simply unadulterated vandalism, such as this, this, and many more. The length of the block, 1 week, is a compromise. It takes into account the fact that you have not been blocked before, but also the fact that you have received far more than enough warnings, including a "final" warning in February 2012. You should have been blocked after that, and if you continue in the same way you are likely to be blocked for far longer, perhaps indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Purdon't, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MU Student Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Student union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR!


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR! ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRORRRRRRRRRR!, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipizza


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipizza, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

The article Southwest Swim Club has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

From your unblock request during the time when you were blocked in the past, it seems that you are of the opinion that making a number of constructive edits somehow makes it acceptable to also make vandalism edits. That is a view which is not generally shared by the Wikipedia community, and certainly not one that I share. I see that since that block you have continued to intersperse vandalism and "joke" edits among other, more constructive edits, and also that you still continue to create unsuitable articles, despite the numerous deletions and messages about doing so. You have therefore been blocked again, this time for three months. That is a large jump up from the length of the last block, but, as explained in your last block notice, it takes into account the fact that you have been receiving messages about your disruptive editing for a long time (since December 2010), and it also takes into account the fact that you were warned that any more vandalism would be likely to lead to a much longer block. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590573811 your edit] to Structured Query Language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give SQL a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, here's what I wanted to ask you, Andy. I tried to do a conventional move in order to "swap" the two pages, but Wikipedia wouldn't allow me to for some reason. I was blocked for three months for vandalism earlier on, but my block expired on 19 December 2013 and I haven't been re-blocked (or even received a warning) for nearly a month since then. Could you get someone to please explain what's been going on with the page (or offer one yourself if you're an admin?) In any case, whenever we get to the bottom of this, just have whatever authority on the matter leave a message on my talk page. Thank you very much, User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not an admin, I'm not trying to block anyone, I used the warning template in the hope that its links would point you at relevant explanations.
 * There are two issues here: should it be moved?, how to move it? I would suggest that both of these are better addressed at talk:SQL.
 * Should it be moved? No and not yet. No, because of WP:COMMONNAME. Not yet, because making a substantial rename like this to  a high-traffic page should always be discussed beforehand and only carried out with solid consensus behind it. In this case, I'd be amazed if such a consensus could be achieved.
 * How to move it requires the page to be moved by an admin. There are tags to request this. What we can't do is to copy-paste move it, as you did here, because that loses the page's edit history and copyright attribution trail. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pointers. User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Boundary of London
Hello, Davidfreesefan23,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Boundary of London should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Boundary of London.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Northern England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Carlisle, Scarborough, Sunderland, Salford and Lancaster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you as you are clearly not here to help build an encyclopedia. -- John Reaves 01:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Davidfreesefan23 (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Flamestinguisher listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flamestinguisher. Since you had some involvement with the Flamestinguisher redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. noq (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Upcoming event at the WWI Museum in Kansas City
Hello! I would like to invite you to a Wikipedia editathon about WWI and Dissent on November 22 at the National World War I Museum in Kansas City. Join us for the U.S. branch of this international event as we write more social history from the era around WWI into Wikipedia! All editors are welcome, contributors to topics around WWI other than Dissent also encouraged! Food and drinks will be supplied by the WWI museum, Sadads (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Break Time logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Break Time logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Break Time (convenience store) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Break Time (convenience store) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Break Time (convenience store) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fences &amp;  Windows  14:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)