User talk:Davidg58

Welcome
Hello, Davidg58, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  21:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Edit at List_of_unsolved_murders_in_the_United_Kingdom
David, I reverted your edit at List_of_unsolved_murders_in_the_United_Kingdom because you edited the headings rather than create a new row. I added your information back as a new row. You can see how I added a row here.

I was unable to find the article you cited on the East London Advertiser website. If you can find the article online it would be good to change my citation which currently reads:

to something like:

It isn't necessary if you are sure that the article exists, but it makes it easier for readers of the article to verify the facts and find more information. If I misinterpreted your edit, and no such article exists, please remove the citation entirely. ParacusForward (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

 * David, the entry you created is still on the list. This is a collaborative website where users try to work together to create an encyclopedia. I moved your entry from the headers to a new row as I mentioned in the message above. Because I was unable to confirm the source, and you did not update the entry, I did briefly remove the it, but another user was able to find a different reference and added it back. So, despite the trouble you had adding the entry, through the efforts of the three of us it is now properly on the list and has a known valid citation. ParacusForward (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)