User talk:Davidgoodheart/Archive 1

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Davidgoodheart. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! —This lousy T-shirt (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Lists of people who disappeared. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of people who disappeared, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The "Little book of true ghost stories" doesn't qualify as a reliable source and this article is not about ghost stories. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dont Look Now logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dont Look Now logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Mypetmonsterlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mypetmonsterlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiffany Sessions


A tag has been placed on Tiffany Sessions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dmol (talk) 06:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiffany Sessions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiffany Sessions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tiffany Sessions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#8209; Iridescent 09:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Tiffany Sessions Reply
Hi Davidgoodheart,

Thank you for adding additional citations to support the article! Nicknames don't typically provide too much encyclopedic value unless they were referred to in the media regularly by that nickname during coverage. I will let you be the judge of if it shall remain.

In terms of deletion, if the article is deleted this is considered final in the realm of Wikipedia for this type of an article. Last I checked the discussion was swayed in favor of keeping the article.

Let me know if you have any further questions! Dane2007 (talk) 03:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Just FYI, I did some major work on restructuring, citing and adding images to Tiffany Sessions today after a large portion of it was removed due to a lack of inline citations. I removed one line and added a citation needed tag to another if you could check that out. -- Dane 2007  talk 21:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Evelyn Hartley


A tag has been placed on Evelyn Hartley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 02:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evelyn Hartley


The article Evelyn Hartley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * WP:1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 02:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Wrestling Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Evelyn Hartley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evelyn Hartley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Evelyn Hartley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UFO Kidnapped, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallel universe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Protection Filter at Don't Look Now (1983 TV series)
Hi David,

One of your references at Don't Look Now (1983 TV series) was configured in a way that it did not comply with citation styles and it bypassed the protection filter. As the link is currently prohibited on the wiki, I have removed it from the article. This may result in new citations being needed and/or a request that the url be unblocked from the wiki. For further information on the relevant policy that triggered the protection filter, please see Spam blacklist.

Thanks! -- Dane 2007  talk 21:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Copying from licensed wikis requires proper attribution
It appears that you have added material to the article List of The Transformers (TV series) characters using content from the Transformers Wiki. While you are welcome to re-use licensed content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying from other compatibly-licensed wikis, please at minimum mention in an edit summary at the new page where you got the content. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please go back and provide attribution. Let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your area in my article space
Hey David,

I thought i'd post this link on your talk page here so you can always find your spot on my userspace for when we're collaborating :). -- <b style="color:blue">Dane 2007 </b> talk 03:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Updated this as my username has changed and your page moved under my new username. -- <b style="color:blue">Dane 2007 </b> talk 17:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Adding new workspaces above per your request at my talk page. --  Dane talk  04:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

The move is done
Let me know if you have any questions. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Table
Hi, could you please add the Mighty Thor defeated El Cubano match to the Wiki table that is in the area you made for me? After that I will add it to an article. Thanks


 * (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Was this for me, Davidgoodheart? -- <b style="color:blue">Dane 2007 </b> talk 23:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that article was for you to add onto since I don't yet know how to do that quite yet. After that I will re-add to the article that I copied it from. Thanks


 * (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This is completed I believe, I left the time field as dashes for you cause I'm not sure what data should be there. Sorry I did not see the request here, it doesn't notify me unless you or write on my talk page. -- <b style="color:blue">Dane 2007 </b> talk 03:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, but the might thor match defeated El Cubano match should be at the top of the box, not the bottom.


 * (talk) 04:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * ✅ -- <b style="color:blue">Dane 2007 </b> talk 04:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your help!! I will let you know about my next article real soon.


 * (talk) 05:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem. Always happy to help :). -- <b style="color:blue">Dane 2007 </b> talk 05:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Made an article from your specialty
Thought you might like to take a look - feel free to improve of course. I was inspired by your abilities to create these articles. -- <b style="color:blue">Dane 2007 </b> talk 23:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Disappearance of Joan Risch changes
David,

I could say something about the irony of you saying the article wasn't properly formatted when your own signature on my talk page wasn't properly formatted. But anyway ...

Please do not reduce the intro section of the article to that one sentence again. In this regard I commend to your attention MOS:LEDE: "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents." We have the Lead too short template for a reason ... your change would have led to someone else placing it on the article. The two-graf intro provides a reasonable summary of what the article itself goes into in greater length. You don't seem to realize this (did you notice how the two paragraphs don't flow at all well into the beginning of the investigation section where you insist on shoehorning them?)

You also seem, as some less experienced editors are, convinced that the article has to begin with boldfaced words echoing the title. If you go down to the appropriate sections of MOS:LEDE, you'll see that that is not a requirement, that lead sentences should not be worded that way no matter how contorted the language gets (and for exactly that reason).

The article is about Ms. Risch's disappearance, not her life (even though it does include her birth date). Therefore the lead grafs are descriptive of the event. They do not need to be substantially rewritten, at least not to biography format.

Look, I have written, over the last few years, a lot of the "Disappearance of ..." articles. No one else has ever suggested they might be "not formatted right to begin with", and that includes a lot of people who've read over them when I've nominated them for DYK and such. Your edits give me the impression you're not really familiar with the MOS pages I've linked to. If you really think you're in the right, don't revert my last edit reverting yours. Explain to me what policies you're doing this under, and why you think they justify your edits. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Daniel, you may be right, as I am not as experience as you, so if I was wrong I do apologize. It just every missing persons case that I have seen starts of with their name and birth date, so I thought I was doing the right thing. About the sources in the 1960s section, I have seen a lot of people use the Doe network and the Charley project, so I would say that they are reliable sources. Thank you for calling me well meaning, and I still do not know how to add the right signature.


 * (talk) 02:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Yeah, a lot of those look like bio articles. First, a lot of people writing them for the first time see the bio articles (which make up nearly a quarter of our articles) and think that's how to do it. It's understandable, it's easier ... but the event is what's notable, not the person (For an exception to this I recently did see Rico Harris, who I realized was notable in his own right as a star high school basketball player and highly-sought college recruit whose possible college choices got covered in newspapers well outside his native area).
 * The Charley Project: I know a lot of people use it, but that doesn't make it a reliable source. Meaghan, bless her, researches and writes those pages all by herself and publishes them once she's done—without anyone else looking at them. That makes them self-published, so we can't use them no matter how much other people rely on them (I admit, though, that I think they're OK for information like a birthdate and an MP's height and weight if I can't find that elsewhere). She does list the names of the outlets she uses at the bottom of every page, but not the specific articles from whence the specific facts came. So it's a nice place to start looking for the original sources from, if you don't mind spending the time. Usually she gets things right.
 * It's important to be very careful about our sources in true-crime articles, particular if they're about recent events, because even though the person at issue may be missing and/or dead, there are still other people whose reputations may be affected by what Wikipedia says about them.
 * Is there something not working with the four tildes? Daniel Case (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * , if you want to have a standard signature like is referring to, you can copy and paste the following into the signature box on your preferences page:   --  Dane  talk  21:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Davidgoodheart/Afterburner (Transformers)
Hi, Davidgoodheart! I've re-located the Afterburner article to your userspace, linked just above, so you can work on it at your leisure. I left the tag at the top of the article that describes some of the problems, so you'll have an idea of what to focus on. Basically, the article needs a couple of major improvements. 1) Locating and adding some reliable outside sources to verify that the subject is justified in having its own article. 2) Re-writing so that the tone is more encyclopedic, and less "in-universe." You might refer to this page to help. Joyous! | Talk 20:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Davidgoodheart!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Davidgoodheart, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. --  Dane talk  05:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

January 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at My Girl 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * I have noted your edits adding the actors that portrayed Judy and Kevin in the movie. Neither is in the opening credits of the film, and they are both considered minor characters. I suggest you read the guidelines on films at MOS:FILM, and particularly WP:FILMCAST regarding the prominence of roles in the film. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Regarding your posts on my talk page: I'm thinking you are having some trouble signing your posts. To do that properly, add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your message. When you save, it will display your name and when you made the post. MPFitz1968 (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate Article
Hi David,

I discovered Laurel Van Ness today, which appears to be a duplicate article on Chelsea Green.

Thanks! --  Dane talk  04:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for telling me, I will erase my Chelsea Green article now, Why don't we rename the current page Chelsea Green
 * Responded at my talk page :). --  Dane talk  07:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Hollywood Blondes
You need to provide a source that shows PWI was wrong or misprinted. You can't just remove dates and say it was misprinted or unknown if a source states otherwise. <b style="color:Red">Chris "WarMachineWildThing" </b> Talk to me 07:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Here's a nice page that proves that I'm right
Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts

Don't take offense because someone removes one or more of your edits. ★Trekker (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Linne Dominelli
Hi; the latest addition is in red text because the article page is spelt differently to the rest of the article. Linne Dominelle or Linne Dominelli? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big John Studd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honky Tonk Man. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

National varieties of English
In a recent edit to the page Andy Gibb, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 03:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Logging "Articles that I have contributed to listed below"
I see you make many edits to Articles that I have contributed to listed below and such on your userpage, You do know all your edits are logged here: Special:Contributions/Davidgoodheart and is probably easier than going back to your userpage to log edits that are already logged. Just thought I'd point this out in case you were unaware. Cheers, - Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 19:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kathleen McCormack Durst for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen McCormack Durst is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kathleen McCormack Durst until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Super Mario Mancini
The two are fairly close in appearance, but nothing uncanny. NES Mario certainly isn't a brunette. Lou Albano looks exactly like the TV version, and that connection is well-sourced. Unless someone has compared the two Marios in a reliable source, it just doesn't belong.

It is something to think about, though, and now I have, so thanks. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kathleen McCormack Durst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dinner party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Kirk von Ackermann
I have reverted your deletion as the page on Kirk Von Ackermann does exist. It needs some refs and a little TLC but it is there. Puzzled as to why you deleted. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 18:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I knew it was an error and not deliberate. Please keep the conversation on your talk page if it is started there. If you reply after I have posted here then that means I am watching your page you could always put in which will let me know that you have responded. And please, please, always add the four tildes (they look like this ~ which create a signature and date and timestamp. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Kathleen McCormack Durst
Don't move an article that is being considered for deletion again. You also made a royal mess out of it that I had to clean up. It's back the way it was, and leave it that way. If the closing administrator decides the appropriate result of the AfD is to move it, that's up to them.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Personal Opinion
Your personal opinion is not relevant, what is relevant is what RS (and what consensus decides is RS) thus if RS give two separate dates we have to include both, and your opinion as to which one is correct is irrelevant. Please restore the fact that there are two dates listed for Mrs Forsteins disappearance. Slatersteven (talk) 14:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

RS
The findthemissing.org website has user created content and as such is not RS (for all we know you write the information there) in addition you say in this edit they are not as reliable as other sources and remove them, then reinsert then here  why? Slatersteven (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Disappearance of Julie Surprenant
 * added a link pointing to Terrebonne


 * Gentleman John
 * added a link pointing to John Harris (footballer)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Bambi Hall Girls Gone Wild.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bambi Hall Girls Gone Wild.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you don't fix this, it could potentially be for put up for deletion. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Idioms
There are thousands of idioms on wiktionary already at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:English_idioms and https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Idioms_by_language - these categories are linked at the bottom of the idiom article. --McGeddon (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Twin Towers
Since you only expanded the Twin Towers article, it should not be listed in your list of articles created. That's taking credit for something you didn't do. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)