User talk:Davidkt

Just a word to the wise. The usual Wiki style (see Manual of Style) for albums and EPs is Albums and EPs, whilst single titles are styled as "Singles". Your recent, otherwise fine and decent upgrade, to Tenpole Tudor applies. Thank you,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there - another useful page for standards is the albums project page, WP:Albums. Pls have a read and keep up your useful contributions. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Davidkt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Aramova (talk) 20:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Bros The Time Album
Dear David

My Name is Tony Knight and I have spent the past 30 years following the history of Bros, Matt and Luke Goss. I was adding content about the Time album this to include the album 3 million worldwide sales, also including the Track chart history UK and Ireland and Europe. I am being targeted by a Australian member NQR9 who removes accurately sourced content and then starts bulling members, I have emailed this person they confirmed they have no knowledge bros history and if they want to remove content they can. can you help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrosHistory (talk • contribs) 13:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Please ignore this member . It is a sock puppet/ban evasion from TomWatkins1970.  Take a look at the sock puppet history if you need evidence.Nqr9 (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

I avoid doing much of anything on Wikipedia anymore. Its leftist PC bias annoys me. The use of BCe and/or Before Present (BP) instead of BC in articles REALLY gets my goat! As a result, I am not getting involved here, though I seriously doubt that The Time album sold 3 million copies. Push yes. The Time? Hard evidence would be needed and properly sourced, such as PRS, RIAA sales figures etc. Davidkt

Kiss Their Sons
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kiss Their Sons, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.itm-ed.de/tvamp/music/discography/kisstheirsons.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
I noticed that you moved Themes from S'Express - The best of S'Express back to Themes from S'Express - the Best Of. I initially moved it because the title is shown as Themes from S'Express - The best of S'Express in, , and. I won't change it back until you respond or 7 days, whichever is first.  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 20:03, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah ok. Even though it is WP:OR, I believe you, as I don't own the album or have even heard of it before this happened.  Sorry about that!   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 20:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

BAD
I didn't add the section, but I was pleasantly surprised to read it as well Chadwholovedme (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Alan Vega birthdate
As you may know Alan Vega's birthdate is currently listed as 1948. There appears to conflicting evidence - the official book - versus the currently sourced Blast First Press Release. I'm trying to build consensus for a change. Please add comments on Talk :Alan Vega. Thanks. Wwwhatsup (talk) 06:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

The Slider
Hi David, I've edited your information added to the release of The Slider on a few grounds. Making the Reviews in the infobox or elsewhere into links rather than cites encourages link rot per WP:ALBUMS, and should not happen. A lot of information you added was uncited so I had it removed. Of the information you included again and cited, a good chunk was from Discogs which should not be used as a reliable source as it's information is all user-generated. I've cleaned up a bit of what you added now. Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Davidkt. You are right about the Thunderbird release being a new album entirely. I don't know if it's tracklist is so important rather than an explanation of what it is related to the album. We might as well just say "In 2002 Thunderbird released an album featuring outtakes of the Slider" or something to that effect. Discogs should not be used as a reliable source as the source of information on the site could be from anyone anywhere as anyone could be uploading incorrect or fake information. If more information can not be found out about these releases, then it's probably not that notable. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

The Essential Grandmaster Flash
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Essential Grandmaster Flash, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://flashfan.net/uk/1219/B000MR9DO0/The_Essential_Grandmaster_Flash. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonas Valley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 4th Armored Division and 89th Infantry Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Jonestown
Please do not re-post content sourced from http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/. This site does not meet WP:RS as it is WP:QUESTIONABLE/WP:UGC content that features conspiracy theories based upon the author's own experiences and other unreliable sources.

Additionally, the author of the site, Laurie Efrein-Kahalas, has written a book, Snake Dance: Unravelling the Mysteries of Jonestown, that is a "Publish On Demand" book that has not affiliated with any acceptable book publisher/editor. This further qualifies her website and book as sources that fall under WP:QUESTIONABLE/WP:UGC.

For more information on what constitutes a reliable source, please review WP:SOURCES. AldezD (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Most appreciated and noted :)

Bros the best of
Hi their I sorry to bother you I am new to wiki and I added the bpi certification on wiki page best of bros but I cant get the citification header to match up with the table could you please advise, I so sorry to bother you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brosisboss (talk • contribs) 19:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry mate. Not a clue on how to do this. Don't use Wiki much. Love Bros though!

Nomination of The Best of Big Audio Dynamite for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Best of Big Audio Dynamite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Best of Big Audio Dynamite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 05:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Big Audio Dynamite I & II for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Audio Dynamite I & II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Big Audio Dynamite I & II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)