User talk:Davidwinston85

Proposed deletion of Lobster ball
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lobster ball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. triwbe (talk) 05:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lobster ball
A tag has been placed on Lobster ball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 05:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I've rejected the speedy delete. The article provides enough context to explain to a reader what it is about. The proposed deletion is still in effect. The article currently appears to be non-notable, and will likely be deleted soon unless independent third-party sources showing that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria are provided. My action gives you a brief period in which to provide them. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 06:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)