User talk:Davidwl2000

May 2014
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Belhaven/Pantego Tornado. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. G S Palmer (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Belhaven/Pantego Tornado for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belhaven/Pantego Tornado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Belhaven/Pantego Tornado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  17:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Belhaven/Pantego Tornado, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 01:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

What did you remove, the links? Cause i added those yesterday, but for one thing, WHY DOES EVERYONE WANT TO REMOVE IT, i gathered that information from he news, friends, family, even TV News like CBS and NBC, it took me 4 weeks to gather that info, its like throwing my hard-worked Research paper in the trash, btw i don't know how to use the talk page, I'm new to this, if you could help this would be easier, thanks, and plz don't remove it.


 * To use a talk page, see Help:Using talk pages; perhaps you could rephrase what your problem is? Also, so long as your information is verifiable, it could easily just be added to a larger article with a broader category in the future (e.g. Tornadoes of 2014). The page would probably be moved to user space for a short period of time, and once all information has been extracted to other articles, then the page deleted. The information must be verifiable, though, so make sure that you have cited sources; regardless of what your friends and/or family say (I am simply stating Wikipedia policy here), as outlined by Wikipedia's policy on verifiability, you must be able to attribute this information to a source, and it must be reliable, meaning that it is credible and that the publisher can be trusted to have posted correct information. Dustin  ( talk ) 11:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I just wanted to make a good page, i didn't know what to do i ton, i was brainstorming, but everything i know is on Wikipedia (I actually checked) except the tornado so i made a good report on it, and i do not know how to upload imaged from my computer, sry for inconvenience. User:Davidwl200