User talk:Davidy2001

October 2018
Hello, I'm ChamithN. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Computer security have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ChamithN  (talk)  07:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Refusenik
Hi Davidy2001, just to let you know, I edited your addition to Refusenik (disambiguation). According to MOS:DABPRIMARY, the sentence around the primary topic should be brief and to-the-point, so I trimmed the description of Refusenik, allowing readers to scan the page more easily. Leschnei (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Security switch


The article Security switch has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Snori (talk) 10:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC) User:Davidy2001 Article Security switch should not be deleted, since it is not reasonable that article Virtual security switch exists , but what is security switch is not explained.

Photonically Optimized Embedded Microprocessors
Hello Davidy2001, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Security switch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardware ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Security_switch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Security_switch?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 23:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Photonically Optimized Embedded Microprocessors
Hello Davidy2001,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Photonically Optimized Embedded Microprocessors for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

~  Araratic  &#124; talk  00:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Human presence detection


A tag has been placed on Human presence detection requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Daiyusha (talk) 05:48, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no button "Contest this speedy deletion", on the page , but it is not correct to delete article , human presence detection is different from human sensing, there are different technologies for this issue , term itself is used by many authors and companies .[ davidy2001]

November 2018
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Accelerometer— has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 15:22, 23 November 2018 (UTC) There is nothing about promotion or advertisement in fact that Accelerometer can be used and is actually used for sound recording. This fact was published by IEEE in 2012, later investigated by University of Michigan and others. User :Davidy2001.

Ways to improve Team error
Hello, Davidy2001,

Thanks for creating Team error! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 21:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Secure Our Smartphones) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Secure Our Smartphones.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Microphone blocker) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Microphone blocker.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Security switch
Have just trimmed. - Snori (talk) 07:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Davidy2001. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Defense strategy
OK, why the revert? You didn't bother to explain. Lfstevens (talk)

I wrote the reason on Talk page, before reverting - the is no point to delete strategy analysis ..if you want to improve it , you are very welcomed. Details, advantages , disadvantages should be there.
 * I didn't delete it. I consolidated the two passes. ?? If there was some specific item that got lost, LMK. I don't edit war so I won't do anything without consensus. Lfstevens (talk) 01:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, some parts was missing , but it is not the main point of section. Looking at Common strategy one can see all strategies and compare them , description should be brief ( otherwise hard to see the other strategies)- now all strategies are on one page. Details as much as possible should be at Strategy analysis section. Specialists in one of section will be able to add as mach details as he want , without making strategies comparison and selecting few of them hard to impossible.

April 2020
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Security switch. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)