User talk:DavisOdia

Copy/pasting text from other sources
One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:NPOV
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:RS
There is no indication that Africa Giant magazine is notable at this point, and as such, it's a violation of WP:WEIGHT and WP:ADVERT to add material about it. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what you are talking about DavisOdia (talk) 21:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about this addition. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote a non-notable magazine (i.e. Africa Giant) via a notable person (Davido). OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * What do you mean promote? DavisOdia (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I mean that if you continue to add links to Africa Giant magazine or make other edits that violate WP:ADVERT or WP:EL, you will be blocked. I hope that's clear enough. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I am simlpy here to contribute to Wikipedia and bear in mind that I am not getting paid to do so and can opt out if I want. You are constantly threatening to block me I don't understand what that is about? DavisOdia (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Everyone have the RIGHT to edit information to any page on Wikipedia. I am a Wikipedian therefore have the right to edit this page in question.
 * You cannot remove an edit unanimously Content Removal like you've done.
 * You are constantly removing the content for no just reason which is Vandalism and this is against Wikipedia policy of VANDALISM
 * You may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors this is against Wikipedia rules of Distruptive Editing
 * Who are you to decide on notability of a media organisation. It sounds like you are simply attacking me without warrant or cause. Again this goes against Wikipedia rules of Distruptive Editing.
 * You also cannot threaten an editor with a BLOCK- Blocking policy/Personal attacks on Wikipedia for supporting the course of Wikipedia without getting paid especially when the contribution meet the Wikipedia guidelines on referencing. If you continue such behaviour of trying to instigate an edit war, you will be reported.
 * You are trying to belittle my genuine contribution towards Wikipedia and you are not allowed to do so. DavisOdia (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * So far, you've attempted to make edits that fall into two categories: (1) Copyright violations, which have been removed and redacted per policy, and (2) edits promoting a non-notable magazine/website. I can and will enforce Wikipedia policies regarding promotion and copyright. You're welcome to contribute to Wikipedia if you'd like to add some content that doesn't violate those or any other Wikipedia rules. Thousands of other editors do so every day. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Explain yourself when you say copyright? You keep coming with something new. What is your motive? DavisOdia (talk) 14:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:COPYVIO explains copyright. We don't permit people to copy and paste copyrighted content from other sites as you did here. The text has been revision-deleted per policy. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I am asking you about Davido page and you are telling me about Latimer? You are contradicting yourself. I do not know anything about what you are saying about Latimer. You are confusing me. Are we still talking about Davido page here? DavisOdia (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * So if Davido page has nothing to do with copyright why talk about copyright? DavisOdia (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you don't desist from this lie and online bully, I will report you DavisOdia (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Stop! Please take a look at wp:DR AND Wp:Ani PAVLOV (talk) 15:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The role of an editor is to edit and not to delete people's work on Wikipedia, especially when the work is true and backed with references. I will take this type of abuse for the very last time; if it pesist,i will have no choice but to do the approprate thing. I have been contributing to information sources online for sometime now and i have never seen a situation where a true and valid information about an individual on Wiki or anywhere else is constantly deleted by a third party who knows fully well that that additional information is true and exists. I was opportuned to see a latest addition to the achievements recorded for one of my Music icons, this information to the best of my knowledge is true and exists in a magazine that is sold on Amazon for £25 under the title AFRICA GIANT EXCLUSIVE MAGAZINE on Amazon, a copy of which i have bought. This style of abuse is not allowed anywhere including here in Wikipedia, you cannot continuously act against Wiki rules by knowing fully well that the edit you are DELETING is true; meaning the magazine that featured Davido exists. Please tell me; What actualy is the reason you are deleting this edit since its not a copyright violation? DavisOdia (talk) 15:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Final warning before block
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg We don't tolerate personal attacks here. Any further attacks will result in an indefinite block. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)