User talk:Davisoliverrichardson

November 2019
Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tom Arnold (actor), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The Daily Beast needs to be used with a lot of caution for information about living people and is generally not reliable enough for controversial statements about them. See WP:RSP for additional information on the website's reliability, and see WP:BLP for the policies regarding living persons. Thank you.'' – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and additional information
You need to include reliable sources when you add content to biographies of living persons, such as your edit to the George Papadopoulos page, as per the WP:BLP policy. On the Tom Arnold (actor) page, your addition did not include a direct quote, and the vast majority of the addition was not sourced at all. The content also does not seem relevant for an encyclopedic biography as per the WP:DUE policy. For example, is it going to be relevant to his biography in 10 years? If something about Arnold having an obsession with Trump is relevant to add, then it needs to have more reliable sourcing and be added in a more encyclopedic tone. For further discussion about article content, please start a discussion on the relevant talk page, such as Talk:Tom Arnold (actor), so that other editors are aware of the discussion. Please sign your talk page comments with ~.

Finally, you need to declare if you have a conflict of interest per WP:COI and you should likely not be making direct additions of material from your own reporting. You should instead make an edit request on the article's talk page, proposing your suggested addition there for other editors to review.

I posted this message in response to your comment on my talk page. I am also posting it here for you to see. Please feel free to respond here. I am watching your page and will see any response to me here. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariana Dahan has been accepted
 Mariana Dahan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MurielMary (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Mariana_Dahan help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

January 2020
Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Mariana Dahan have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)