User talk:Davykamanzi/Archives/Archive 11

Orphaned non-free image File:Eddy Gordo (T7).png
Thanks for uploading File:Eddy Gordo (T7).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSI - Lamborghini sample.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:KSI - Lamborghini sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox YouTube personality
Template:Infobox YouTube personality has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox presenter. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

GoTv
Hi, sorry if may be i disturb you. Please i just find out you redirect a page [GOtv] to DSTV with due respect i'll like you to permits me so that i'll recreate the page [GOtv] because i have already write the [GOtv] article in my android Note Book . Much respect. ( F5pillar --- Let's talk🖋📩 ) 16:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You can create a draft for the article and finish it first, then copy the content to the page here or submit it for review using F5pillar at the top of the draft. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 15:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * OK how about this one GOtv Africa, is it OK. ( F5pillar --- Let's talk🖋📩 ) 10:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FIFA World Release 9 interface.png
Thanks for uploading File:FIFA World Release 9 interface.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phoenix Starr College (June 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by John from Idegon were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phoenix Starr College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Phoenix Starr College, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Phoenix_Starr_College Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_from_Idegon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Phoenix_Starr_College reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The tone of the draft could be altered, but Luton Today is an established news source in the Bedfordshire area; I feel other similar institutions, even in the same area, have articles in the mainspace despite receiving a smaller amount of significant coverage (e.g. the Stella Mann College of Performing Arts, which I assume is able to remain on the mainspace thanks to some brief coverage on one BBC News article, though admittedly that is a more reputed source than Luton Today). Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 01:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Football match line-ups
Template:Football match line-ups has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Prezzee concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Prezzee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Kabagambe has been accepted
 Anne Kabagambe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Anne_Kabagambe help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Fiddle  Faddle  16:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fbml
Template:Fbml has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 05:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
<div style="display: flex; align-items: center; height: 100px; padding: 1em; border: solid 3px #2B547E; background-color: #E6E6FA;"> Wishing Davykamanzi a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  06:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 06:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cynthia Umezulike (August 22)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cynthia_Umezulike Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M-Mustapha&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cynthia_Umezulike reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha talk  13:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * May I ask how the sources provided don't satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BASIC? Various aspects of the subject's life and career are covered at length in the provided sources; the content in the draft is referenced to info provided by the sources' authors prior to the interviews with the subject, rather than from info provided by the subject herself (per WP:INTERVIEW). Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 16:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * OK! Please if I may ask you, which of the GNG and Basic criteria did the article subject pass? that made her worthy of encyclopedic. Em-mustapha  talk  19:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * All the references besides refs 1, 6, and 8 (which are used to simply establish her association with the Child's Rights Advocacy Journal, Birkbeck University of London and Come Dine with Me respectively) are secondary sources that provide significant coverage and are independent of the subject. The sources are all published by established news organisations in Nigeria (and London, in the case of the Newham Recorder). Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 21:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * This is my question, which of the GNG and Basic criteria did the article subject pass? And regarding your claim of significant coverage I still don't see the subject covered significantly in reliable sources. Em-mustapha  talk  09:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * As far as I'm concerned, all the criteria have been satisfied by the subject. According to WP:GNG, "significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." The sources provided in the draft apart from refs 1, 6 and 8 as previously mentioned all provide significant coverage per the aforementioned definition, and info referenced to the interviews (refs 2, 3 and 5) is drawn from secondary sources as outlined at WP:INTERVIEW. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 11:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't think significant coverage is enough with less than 10 sources and most of them are not Reliable, You also claim WP:Basic in your argument, tell me how the subject pass the criteria. Please I just want you to judge your article yourself, if you are satisfied then resubmit your draft and another editor will review it. Em-mustapha  talk  19:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

There are no guidelines anywhere that stipulate a fixed number of sources required to establish notability. WP:BASIC requires the subject to have "received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" and I've already explained how I feel the subject has satisfied these criteria. I already resubmitted the draft so I'll be waiting on the review of another editor. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 06:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cynthia Umezulike (September 23)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cynthia_Umezulike Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cynthia_Umezulike reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Justin Picard has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Justin Picard. Thanks! Fiddle  Faddle  09:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I dropped six of the citations and left in what I felt were the most comprehensive sources for that statement. Kindly have another look. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 11:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * On another note, the specific criteria notes at WP:ACADEMIC also state that:


 * With this in mind, the 11 citations as previously included in the draft were perhaps needed, so that introduces some confusion on my part when you mention WP:CITEKILL. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 11:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * A fact once verified, is verified. I am just providing you with advice.  Fiddle   Faddle  11:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 12:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't mean to be a bother, but if there aren't any other outstanding issues, would you be willing to review the draft? Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 06:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I try only to make one review, either by comment or by formal review. My review today would be very similar to my prior comment. While you have reduced the citekill I stil see it present. You need a different reviewer. They are likely, though, to have the same opinion. You may wish to look at WP:BOMBARD Fiddle   Faddle  07:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I've gone through the draft again and done my best to minimise the citekill—while still maintaining what I feel are the most comprehensive sources—to at most three references per statement as advised earlier. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 08:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If the 'spare' references contain other facts, use them to write those facts and cite them. You will produce a better aticle that way. There is little point in even three, though most folk seem to like it Fiddle   Faddle  10:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * None of the "spare" refs contain other facts other than the ones asserted in the draft. In instances where multiple refs are used for one statement, those refs are used to verify the subject's invention of the copy detection pattern (CDP) following advice at the specific criteria notes at WP:ACADEMIC as previously illustrated, or verifying examples given of uses of CDP technology (e.g. "it was used to protect FIFA badges at the 2006 World Cup, and by pharmaceutical manufacturers to restrict illicit trade in medicine"). Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 12:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Archive index
Template:Archive index has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Hayat (September 23)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Hayat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Hayat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Joseph_Hayat Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Celestina007&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Joseph_Hayat reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 15:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Could you provide some detail on your comment? As far as I can tell, multiple sources in the draft give detailed information on various aspects of the subject's life and career. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 18:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * @, I believe GNG is not met nor any criterion from WP:JOURNALIST, if you think otherwise you may re-submit the article. I should however let you know that doing minimal or no substantial work pertaining to what I have pointed out would mean your article would still be declined. Celestina007 (talk) 19:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Justin Picard has a further new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Justin Picard. Thanks! Fiddle  Faddle  13:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I trimmed out the content providing information on the copy detection pattern and limited it to just the first statement attributing Mr Picard as the inventor. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 20:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Do not stop improving the draft while awaiting review. The best process is the following:
 * seek out references about Picard
 * from those references selective facts, additional facts, you wish to assert
 * create a storyboard from those facts
 * Write (or rewrite) the draft based upon the storyboard, using your references in a rifle targeted manner as citations for those deleted facts
 * In this way you create a draft that is hard to challenge in terms of referencing and facts. The only thing then standing in the way of acceptance is whether those facts are genuinely notable. This tends to be proven with three substantial references in major WP:RS which are significant coverage about Picard. A respected scientific journal, respected computing journal, respected national newspaper.
 * I think you have worked hard and done a good job. I will not make a formal review because I have helped you sufficiently to have become involved with the draft. My work is to teach you to fish, not to throw you a fish. Whether you and I have been successful is in the hands of the next reviewer(s). Fiddle   Faddle  21:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Joey Badass - The Light Pack.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joey Badass - The Light Pack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SportPesa Premier League.png
Thanks for uploading File:SportPesa Premier League.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Nomination of Michael Kamure for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kamure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Kamure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ligi Ndogo Grounds


The article Ligi Ndogo Grounds has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not a stadium but a series of football pitches; I can't see how this meets any inclusion criteria (e.g. WP:GNG)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 12:46, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ligi Ndogo Grounds for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ligi Ndogo Grounds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ligi Ndogo Grounds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 12:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Innocent Umezulike
Please refrain from updating this with false information. My updates are factual and not fake dates!!

Proposed deletion of 2011 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season


The article 2011 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not covered by WP:NSEASONS and completely fails WP:GNG; also violates WP:NOTSTATS"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2013 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season


The article 2013 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not covered by WP:NSEASONS and completely fails WP:GNG; also violates WP:NOTSTATS"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Picard (November 25)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Picard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Justin Picard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Justin_Picard Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SL93&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Justin_Picard reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The notion that the subject isn't notable doesn't make sense to me when the academic publications referenced in the draft (and the ones removed in line with WP:CITEKILL) demonstrate that he passes (at least) criterion 1 of WP:NACADEMIC. If there's something I'm missing or have missed, kindly explain it to me. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 12:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely convinced, but I think it has a chance of surviving a deletion discussion so I accepted it. SL93 (talk) 14:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If such a discussion arises and there's consensus to delete, I'll be sure that more work needs to be done. Thanks for reviewing the draft. Davykamanzi → <b style="color:#0AE;">talk</b> • <b style="color:#ED2;">contribs</b> • <b style="color:#264;">alter ego</b> 15:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevin Omondi


The article Kevin Omondi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 08:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)