User talk:Davysonne

August 2021
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Not disruptive. And not at all ‘vandalizing’. Simply adding some content and fixing typos. This is my first time doing edits. The administrator should be less dramatic. And I’ll be more careful from now on. Davysonne (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The IP is not an administrator, but I am. Your edit to Antifeminism was vandalism. If you edit that way again, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

How is that edit vandalism? It’s a genuine social problem. I didn’t have a ‘citation to reliable source’ so it was taken down. You need to watch your tone when talking to me. Being an administrator doesn’t give you the privilege to threaten other people. I will definitely edit Antifeminism again, after I find the correct citation. And now I will report you for threatening me. Davysonne (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice
 Acroterion   (talk)   18:32, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok, what does this have to do with my edit in ‘Antifeminism’? I proposed a genuine social problem today caused by feminism, the false harassment allegations ruining innocents’ lives. It was taken down due to lack of citation. And that administrator called my edit ‘vandalism’, threatened ‘if I edit it like that again, I risk being banned’?? Who are you to threaten me? I’m definitely editing it again. I think you’re the vandalism here, administrator. Davysonne (talk) 18:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I would call antifeminism a gender-related topic, wouldn't you? And yes, you need sources, especially for something obviously controversial. Your reaction to being asked to source your edits isn't what's expected from editors in general, and certainly not on controverisal topics. While I would observe that you got a lot of warnings in a hurry, and I wouldn't have called your edits vandalism, you need to be prepared to substantiate your edits to topics like this.There's not been reporting on your assertion in a broad range of reliable sources, this seems like editorializing on your part.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Today is the first time I’m using Wikipedia contributor. Out of curiosity, I made several small edits on various topics first, just to see how things work. I wasn’t being ‘disruptive intent’ or ‘vandalizing’. I’m just learning how edits work. Now that I’ve learnt how to edit, I’ll be more careful from now on and make useful edits. Davysonne (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

As for my edit on ‘Antifeminism’, it was completely normal and within topic. I proposed a social problem. But that administrator ‘Bbb23’ reported me, called my edit ‘vandalism’, threatens me not to do it again, or I may get banned. So I’m very confused and agitated right now. Do you know why administrator‘Bbb23’ threaten me for a normal edit? I’m definitely gonna report Bbb23. Davysonne (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * You edit was not "normal." It was an unsourced assertion with little credibility on a controversial topic, which resembled the kind of trolling often seen on this topic, and which have yet to substantiate. You've met criticism with bluster - "I'm going to report somebody" isn't a substitute for sourcing,especially on a topic that gets a lot of drive-by abuse. You weren't "reported," you were warned. Now that you know, I'm certain you'll understand that you are expected to abide by the encyclopedia's sourcing policies. I recommend that you either find a consensus of sources in mainstream publications that support your assertion, finding consensus first on the article's talkpage, or find another topic in which you can contribute from a neutral point of view, using reliable sources.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:53, 8 August 2021 (UTC)