User talk:Dawid Louis Bekker

Dawid’s theory
The theory entails time being the 4th dimension. The speed of Light is the boundary of the 3rd dimension. Objects cannot move faster than the speed of light without popping in and out of existences. The existences refer too the information carried by light. The information ,that is carried by electromagnetic radiation, refers to the change in properties ,of the electromagnetic radiation ,after it was reflected by a body in space. The observation of the electromagnetic radiation signals change. Change is the essence of time. Although time can be allocated to the position in space and change in the position of space, I am not certain if the change in position in space can happen in the absence of a light source and black hole. Divergence of light around the sun is less than 0. Divergence of light in space is always 0. Divergence of light in a black hole is always positive. It Is much like Maxwells magnetic field equations but these have much less proof.

The speed of light is constant due to a constant force in the universe that attracts light. This theory supports the theory of light divergence as the speed of light is constant since light is not made up of many loose particles and like a string being pulled the tension and speed the string travels is constant where ever you measure it.

Else the speed of light is a constant due to a energy limit per unit space in the universe.

This is a theory made up by a 2022 high schooler. Any reasons why my theories are wrong is welcomed Message 0605868794 if you agree or disagree with this theory Dawid Louis Bekker (talk) 18:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Never mind. I am very uncertain about my theory. Dawid Louis Bekker (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Although I still theorise that the reason for particles popping in and out of existence is due too more mass/charge per c square in another realm/factor of the 3 dimension. Meaning a higher energy per the 2D plane square(as in shape) of c square causes an attraction through time and particles will travel 4th dimensionally(through 3rd dimensions) too neutralise it since it is a large mass and/or charge density relative too all mass and/or charge densities. Another perspective is a that there is more mass per free space relative too other masses causing particles of “negative mass” too neutralise the mass causing it too fall into the normal mass per free space (epsilon zero and mu zero). Dawid Louis Bekker (talk) 11:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

An extension on this theory is that space time fabric is forever increasing in size relative too the start a second ago. If one is able too surpass a certain amount of energy per space-time fabric(C^2) then it will cause a movement backwards in time until the ratio too of energy too space-time is met and that timeline of space can up gold the energy and the mass can be present inside of it. A thought experiment that I thought too myself is that if I promise myself too travel back in time when I invent time travel would me not being present right now be proof of my theory being incorrect, or is it proof of me dying attempting the theory or am I the first time like too think of this and the rest of the timelines are dependent on my actions. Marine you are standing on top of a teaser act and all surfaces are covered. If the teaser at was expanding the whole time and you attempted too travel backwards in time you would have too decrease in size as-well too reach the next square ( C^2) this tells me that I will not be in natural form or size relative too the form / fundamental limiting sizes of the past timelines respect too the size of fundamental sizes in the timeline I started travelling in. This means I will not be able too view the Pat in my conscious form unless I am able too shrink my fundamental component to the proportion of the timeline I was too be in. His basically means i will have too shrink myself mass in the same way mass is increased when moving at relative speeds. Dawid Louis Bekker (talk) 20:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Einsteins relativity can describe dark matter as an area where the speed of light changes due the density of the it not changing a and the density of space time line permeability of free space changing as time moves. This mean that time is proportional to the difference of densities in Space timeline to dark energies density. You can calculate density difference by breaking the speed of light into its components .using the distance of velocity of light as a frequency (Hz) (over 1sec). Identify this as the initial time and the too calculate the space time desire of certain time compared to you space time density. The only problem is that the the it is off by one inverse meter from density. By multiplying the mass by acceleration divided by joules you will find that you have the SI units of density. This might be incorrect and stupid but it is an attempt at theoretical time travel. Now where density relativity through time comes in play with time travel is that if you are able too match the dice time density of a previous timeline you will be able to switch too it. This is n very incomplete theory though. Relativity will only work for dark matter if you accept that travelling to the past is possible .You will have too need a negative pressure too be able too go backwards in time.How it describes dark matter is you take the time the universe existed for as your final time line and multiply it in with c. This is the part I am unsure of but The acceleration will have too be negative as it will be travelling backwards through in respect too the expansion of the universe. You could se it as a Hypersphere or a shape that is expanding. The negative acceleration will give you the negative density. the joules the acceleration is divided by is still foreign too me but this is n developing expansion to Einstein’s theory. Since the density of dark matter doesn’t increase and it is very dense itself it is attracted too other space time dense areas and acts on planets the same way a normal force does.

Basically P= ma/e x (Vc/ti x tf)^2 I’m not too sure about the ma/e part since I only added it too balance the SI units too my theory. The value of tf is how long ago dark matter was first formed.

One odd thing I came across is the when I divide the radius size of a nucleus by the size of our sun I found the answer was the same value as the energy density of dark matter. Dawid Louis Bekker (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

The expansion of the universe can’t be a constant speed Dawid Louis Bekker (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)