User talk:Dawned777

January 2024
Hello, I'm Johnj1995. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Tong-its have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dawned777/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Dawned777/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 04:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024


Hello, Dawned777. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created User:Dawned777/sandbox  has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see this page on citing sources and Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat   The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

&#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Deepfriedokra FYI They did it again v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 05:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Wut? &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Deepfriedokra They immediately recreated the sandbox, with all the spam again. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 05:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That was an interjection. Or expletive. &#45;-  Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * English is hard v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 05:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)