User talk:Dawsonthechickendood

January 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Type XXI submarine, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲  (☎)  17:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

No Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 20:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Oregon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 20:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

All I was trying to do was provide a view of my personal experience. Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 20:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a venue to post your personal knowledge. Given your edits to date, you may find this related project more to your liking.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

So if I make a website that has my personal source and “Findings” I can site that? Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No. Sources need to be reliable to be included.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

How do you make a source reliable Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 22:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * You don't "make" a source reliable. A source is reliable if it has a strong history of fact checking and accuracy. Read the page I linked previously.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 00:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I JUST WANT TO CHANGE 3 WORDS, LEAVE ME ALONE!!!! Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 00:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Can I put it here? Dawsonthechickendood (talk) 00:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Since I've removed your access to this talk page, the answer would be "no". You are not welcome here.  Please go away. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:18, 14 January 2020 (UTC)