User talk:Dayhana54

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Dayhana54. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Keiser University, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your edits
Seriously these edits are not approprite. Apart from the promotional tone, which is not acceptable on Wikipedia, it is centered towards an American reader. I am not an American, so why would it say "our nation's veterans" or "our nation's economy"? They are not my veterans, and it is not my economy, when I read an article, it should not assume I am American. --kelapstick(bainuu) 19:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Keiser University, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. ''These edits remove sourced material from the article, their removal, by a self admitted employee of the school is highly inappropriate. It is a clear attempt to white wash the article by removing controversy. The material is sourced properly, it is not to be removed.'' kelapstick(bainuu) 19:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''You are clearly showing that you cannot edit this article objectively. You have a conflict of interest, and you are removing properly referenced content after explicitly being told not to. I strongly suggest you stop before you are blocked from editing. '' kelapstick(bainuu) 19:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)