User talk:Dayn/Archive 1

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

List of black metal bands
Hey. Thanks for your message. Unfortunately I don't know if there is a way to notify readers about that, without also creating a self-reference. Until someone comes up with a good idea, we're stuck with the HTML comments. Anyway, thanks for keeping the article clean of unverified entries. Prolog 12:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion
Why not go ahead and actually check the page out for yourself? Maybe after some positive criticism, I'll consider to stop adding the link. Just a thought. (link removed)

Anyway, I went over the list of bands that you like. I share similar interests. Sonata Arctica in particular.

Sorry, I'm just bored to an inconceivable extent.

Oh, one last thing. I'm actually a solo-artist. I'm not in a band.


 * Hey. I don't pass negative or positive criticism on it. If you want to create the article yourself, go for it; but it has to pass notability, as per WP:MUSIC, and it has to be an actual article, not just a short blurb with a link to myspace; that would still count as link spam, as per WP:SPAM.


 * The reason for this is so worthwhile articles are actually made. If an unknown band is allowed a page with a link to their site or such, then why not any other band? Before you know, there's a tonne of pages revolving around garage bands. In my experience on Wikipedia, band pages are notorious for attracting benefactors and detractors, both plaguing articles with unwanted points of view.


 * So if you wish to make an article for it, go for it, as long as it passes notability and isn't just an advertisement. You can look to Thunderstone if you need a reference to start up a worthwhile stub. --Dayn 09:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a ton, Dayn. I really appreciate your assistance, you've helped me out a great deal. I also apologize for any sort of trouble I may have caused you before, it was all in good fun, eh?

Thanks!
Thanks very much for reverting vandalism on my user page. It is the first time it was ever vandalised (I was hoping for something more clever, but I guess they just aren't making vandals like they used to). Take care, keep up the good work, and let me know if there is ever anything I can do for you. Ruhrfisch 16:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Rap Vocals
In reply to your justification for your blatant vandalism of the sonata arctica article I must inform you that although google is a very good source of information it is by no means definitive or infinite. To make such an assumption reflects very much on your credibility and thus it would be advisable to avoid such assumptions in the future. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.184.35.131 (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC).


 * One must also provide sourced material. To vandalise a user page reflects very much on one's credibility also. Provide a reputable, verifiable source and cite it. --Dayn 13:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

re dragonforce
Sorry about that I thought I was removing where someone changed rhythm to amazing, I must have misread the edit history.--E tac 11:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually it looks like we were editing it at the same time hah, well still sorry for confusing you.--E tac 11:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * That's okay, sorry as well, I was a bit hasty. The edit histories were both in the same minute. Only realised that after checking. --Dane ~nya 11:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

British vs. American grammar
Don't want to start an edit war or anything, but I don't know if Wikipedia prefers one or the other. In the past, people have mentioned that since Wikipedia is mainly based in the US, American spelling/grammar is preferred (though this isn't the best reason, if any). I glanced at the first sentence of a few pages from Category:English_musical_groups, and it seems that it's about half plural, half singular. Unfortunately, I can't search Wikipedia's project/help pages for anything on this. &mdash; SheeEttin {T/C} 17:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * That would be because they were most likely written by American editors, and others didn't want to upset the status quo just to change it. The manual of style says to use the dialect of English that the article is based around. I.e. George Bush, use American spelling; Tony Blair, use British spelling. And after that, to just stick to something to keep it uniform; like jewellery which is written predominantly in British spelling. So that's about it. The article's subject determines it's spelling. --Dane ~nya 02:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Biolich
Just delete the article; there's nothing more I can include. Killridemedly 21:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Rock music Wikiproject invitation
Hello WikiProject Metal member. WikiProject Metal music is important in expanding encyclopedic coverage of the metal. It brings attention to the lesser-known bands, and significantly improves the quality of the famous ones. Five Featured articles and two formers is proof of that. This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently resurrected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and embrace the links between metal and rock music in general. Rock on. -- Reaper  X  04:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Editor review
I reviewed you. YechielMan 17:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)