User talk:Daysheads57

EF Education First
Hi Daysheads57, I took the freedom to decline your speedy deletion request for EF Education First. The criteria for this type of deletion without discussion are quite strict, and a company that employs 9000 people worldwide is likely to be sufficiently important -- this is how I read "assertion of importance" in this case. You might also have noticed that EF has articles on a number of other Wikipedias.

Please note that I do not have any particular "power" on Wikipedia. If you do not agree I would advise you take the article to the Articles for deletion forum to initiate discussion.

Another side note: Instead of it is better to use the template db-a7 because this will put the deletion candidate into the right category. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 13:24, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Pgallert, there is no third party reference to prove 9,000 staff members. I will take this to the articles for deletion. Daysheads57 (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, I completed the process for you. What you did was proposing deletion, that's something else than initiating deletion discussion. You can view and participate in the discussion here. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 09:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that. Hard to follow some of the procedures on wiki. Daysheads57 (talk) 04:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)