User talk:Dayspassions91

License tagging for Image:Kiku lg.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Kiku lg.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Lighthouse
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content of marginal relevance (unnecessary trivia) to articles is not considered productive. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. —EncMstr 02:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dayspassions91! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Mark Cameron Wystrach -

Secret Life
Hello. I notice you started The Secret Life of the American Teenager article. May I ask if this was because you watched the show? If not, maybe you can still help; I was looking for more development and producton for all three seasons. If you can't help, I understand, but I was just curious. Chaos Master Chat 01:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somerset (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Doctors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

A quick note
Hi, this isn't a big deal but I don't understand why you reverted this edit [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sabah&diff=586856885&oldid=586322532] as from what I can tell the edit was accurate. Penny Wong is not the current Australian minister for anything, which isn't surprising since her party is no longer in government. To be fair, the entire sentence could do with some rewording as it simply mentioned her former position without making it clear whether or not it was a former position and then went on to mention her current, now former position. Which of course meant it was even more confusing with the wording change as with the 'current' people may assume the other position was something she no longer holds but with the other position being called 'former' people are likely to assume the opposite namely the first position is in fact her current position which clearly isn't true. So I've reworded the sentence (twice actually).

However the change itself was clearly intended to be helpful and while making things more more confusing, it also reduced inaccuracy as she was not the current minister, so there was no reason to revert it.

I was visiting the page because I was investigating some template vandalism at Template:Flagu/core. It's possible you spotted the vandalism, saw the edit and incorrectly assumed it was the cause of the vandalism. If that was the case, do remember you should nearly always check what you are reverting as otherwise you risk reverting helpful edits. In particular, when you use the undo button as it appears you did, it will show the changes you intend to make in the wikicode. If there's nothing obviously wrong with what you are reverting, it's likely you've misidentified the source of the vandalism.

Do remember that other than template vandalism, there's also the possibility you've misidentified the edit which introduced the vandalism, as sometimes vandalism may stay in an article for a few edits. Even if you are relying on 'show preview' to try and check if vandalism disappears with your change, besides template vandalism which may confuse you, there's also the possibility in some cases (perhaps not this one) that what you thought was vandalism was actually an attempt to improve the article which went wrong. And without at least a cursory check of what you're actually reverting you're won't notice this.

Cheers.

Nil Einne (talk) 02:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of KHHB-LP for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KHHB-LP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KHHB-LP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)