User talk:Daz 90/Archive 1

{| width=100% style="margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: #FBAA0E solid 1px; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background: #F7D48F;" Messages |- |



dave thomas
just to tell you that i'll be fair with you if you'll be fair with me!

Thank you. ➨  JIMOTHY T 

Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, Dean randall, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

 James E. Zavaleta T  C   E 18:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

In response to your User Page Redesign request:
Which colour would you prefer - green or orange? Daniel.Bryant 10:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Complete
Done! Daniel.Bryant 11:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm addicted already
I'm addicted to wikipedia already, its so gd. Have you email William Murrays yet? KingLloyd 15:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Beans
yes i do know how.  King Lloyd  TALK

Archive thing
I did it. If you want the date changed (how old comments have to be for removal), just ask me. Daniel.Bryant 07:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Your Assumptions are Wrong
I have not joined wikipedia to vandalise it, as I find that that creates negative vibes. I have joined it so that I may edit articles and become part of the wikipedia community. You can hardly talk, look what u did to that panzer bloke

Bottombadger 20:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

please get your facts right bottombadger. i did not vandalise panzer's user page but i sent him a welcome message but i mistook his user page for his talk page.  DA RR  e  N   TALK

Image tagging for Image:Navman.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Navman.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Uniform1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Uniform1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Dean randall,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have numerous personal attacks blocks. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Gl e n 10:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

hello there
hey, i saw you welcomed some new users this morning, are you a meber of the Esperanza welcoming comitee?--  Ji MoTh Y  TALK  08:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

yes
So u are a member then?--  Ji MoTh Y  TALK  08:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

copy my monobook.js over to yours
Copy my monobook I got a new tool, built by same person as popups. Really good.--  Ji MoTh Y  TALK  18:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

hey
i am a rwal ditz how do i get my page thingy to look like yours --MaREn 21:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Dave thomas1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dave thomas1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "obtained from burnley site" is not good enough. We need the specific URL. We need to verify its copyright status. It doesn't look like a promotional photogarph to me: see Publicity photos. There is no rationale. The JPS talk to me  19:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Dave thomas1.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Dave thomas1.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The JPS talk to me  19:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Xmasajof.jpg
Why have you given this two tags? If you have ammended an existing copyright image, then it's not allowed. I suspect you got the Santa image from the internet and added two heads on it. The JPS talk to me  19:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

AJOF
Yeah; Wikipedia really requries some sort of charting-release or significant media-hype/radio-play for a group. Articles can always be recreated at more appropriate times! Alternatively, if the charity is notable, you could create an article on them and include a sentence or two on the band, whose page could then redirect to the charity. --Robdurbar 20:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hey, many thanks for the barnstar which I greatly appreciated. It was very kind of you. All the best, Gwernol 00:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

R U Interested?...
Not interested in Spam  DA RR  e  N   TALK  21:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

James Younghusband
The XX F.C. players category is for all footballers who have been on the books of a particular club, regardless of where they are currently. That's why I reinstated the Chelsea F.C. cat. SteveO 23:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Metal Gear Solid
I haven't edited the MGS page for a while now, but if you are talking about the MGS3 characters page, Sokolov is comming back according to the Hideochan thing

†he Bread 22:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

I do have the game, and the viewer has to assume he's dead, you don't see it. Plus, the Hideoblog thing confirmed that Sokolov is returning in Metal Gear Solid: Portable Ops

†he Bread 22:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Ask for help with riotous user
I've noticed you had a quarrel with notorious, thick-as-a-brick disruptor Fastifex. I've postee request for advocacy to make him repent here Maybe it can have your support. Bye and good work. --Attilios 09:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/October 2006/Attilios

Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

MGS3 characters
See Writing about fiction. The general jist is that plot summary and details should be kept to a minimum, instead the article should be filled with stuff like the characters' development (like how The End was originally in MGS2), how fans reacted to them (like how everyone hated Raiden), and their general impact on the real world. What isn't desirable is reams and reams of plot summary (see, for example, The Boss's section in the old article) from an in universe perspective. -- Steel 18:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * *Shrugs* -- Steel 18:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

header
i wanted to know how did you make that cool header.im sorry for the off topic discussion.I am Amrykid  ,Elite wikistudent  and I approve this message.

wikEd


Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Often it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 22:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

hello
i would like to change my username but im not sure how. as i have amassed quite a lot of edits im unwilling to create a new account. please could you tell me where i go to aply for a name change  DA RR  e  N   TALK  15:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Darren - go to Changing username and follow the procedure there Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Your user page
I basically modified D.B's header for you so all the links are yours... if I'm really motivated I might make custom icons for my own use, you'll be welcome to use them too.... as so protecting it, it's its own subpage, but as with the nature of all web code it's impossible to shield it totally... anyway if you have any questions, just talk to me at my page. David Fuchs 23:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Pages
All your pages have been moved to this user. The status changer is in the same spot, only with "Daz 90". Also, with the above header, it is now located at User:Daz 90/SandboxII, as I had to move it out of the way for your original header. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 04:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't forget to fix your signature links, and check your email :) Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 11:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Land Rover bike.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Land Rover bike.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Roger1(3).jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Roger1(3).jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 04:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I nominated for deletion because it is orphaned (OR) which means it is not being used on Wikipedia and I see no encyclopedic value for this image (UE). Wikipedia doesn't need to keep images that aren't being used (there are 90,000+ orphaned images!) and I can't see where this image should be used, since there isn't much information about the image on the page. If it is a picture of you or something that is encyclopedic, then use it, on your userpage or elsewhere as appropriate. If you do nothing, it will likely be deleted Feb. 16th or later. Thank you. --MECU ≈ talk 19:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --McGeddon 07:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Dean saunders.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Dean saunders.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ajof front cover.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Ajof front cover.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Les ferdinand.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Les ferdinand.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ian crook.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Ian crook.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Navman.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Navman.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Les ferdinand.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Les ferdinand.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)