User talk:Dazzlyweb

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dazzly (November 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dazzly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Dazzly Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stuartyeates&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dazzly reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 22:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * We're new to Wikipedia and thought we had done the right thing by disclosing the COI with the article creation on our page and then tried to publish something neutral. Please explain how our competitors are able to post exactly the same sorts of articles but we're not? Please explain how we can just have the same thing they have? We're a very notable business in New Zealand with a long-standing history trying to just have our basic information out there not trying to advertise or acquire customers via Wikipedia. We just want to have our information out there like our competitors and didn't intend to do anything wrong at all.
 * Examples of Competitors:
 * Strikingly
 * Squarespace
 * etc.
 * We have not publically raised and don't have big name backers but that shouldn't mean we can't have a Wikipedia article/information out there/not locked out of all the opportunities like our well financed, well connected competitors, please don't block our basic ability to have a chance/put our information out there.
 * Please let us know how we can have the same sort of Article/opportunity? We are happy to edit whatever we need to so its not seen as an advertisement as we don't want to do that. Dazzlyweb (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * We tried to remove all dazzly.co and press release sources but was unable to due to getting banned. Please let us know how we can proceed? Dazzlyweb (talk) 23:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The whole url is not needed when linking to another article or page on Wikipedia. A url acutally may lock readers into a version of Wikipedia other than their preferred version(mobile or desktop).  The target page title need only be placed in double brackets, as I've done here. 331dot (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dazzly


The page Draft:Dazzly has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)