User talk:Dazzpedian/Sandbox togm

Comments
Hi Dazzpedian, interesting topic choice ... you have provided me with information that I would have otherwise never been exposed to, and that is good (guess I need to get out more)! I liked your synopsis section, it put the topic into a context for me - a reader unfamiliar with the subject matter. I also liked your use of a box to highlight the particulars of this webcomic (author, website,etc.) ... easy for the reader. Good job!--4tiggy (talk) 07:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello Dazzpedian! I just wanted to point out that our general policy is that so long as it's not for profit and properly attributed, we're okay with people using images from our comic, if you wanted to go with the suggestion below. I think that this is awesome, and if you're okay with it, I'd be happy to link it from the FAQ section on TOGM's website. All the best, James (Magravan) Additional Edit: We have changed our web address to http://greymeat.com, and if you want to contact us, we can be reached at gottogm@gmail.com which goes to both of us.

Peer review
Hi! Great article--lots of detail and plenty of content to consider. I'm really liking the variety of article topics, and although far from being a zombie pop culture expert, here would be my suggestions:
 * try finding some external references, to give it more context, maybe Zombie_comics?
 * when I went to the website, it appears that the fan conversations make up a big part of the appeal- might be worth mentioning if this is true- fans interacting directly with the creators
 * when you discuss the zombie levels, perhaps creating a table to insert would make it more readable and break up the text a bit more
 * may not be possible due to copyright, but an image of some kind would be a nice addition
 * adding categories at the bottom of your article will help link it to related topics so others can find this more easily
 * see how other wikipedia articles list characters, for example-if they use bullets- or how they creatively present this info . found one---[] and []

I found it very interesting, easy to follow, well-referenced to that particular website, despite not being familiar with the topic. Nice job!--Ncsjfreed (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ncsjfreed for the feedback. The addition of external references is indeed the major issue with this draft that I mentioned in our class correspondence and I have found a few sources that I will now incorporate. Also, the formatting needs to be tweaked (and still fit into the manual of style for comics -- I am not sure if I can use lists or bullets and still remain consistent... I will see what I can do.  Thanks again, Dazzpedian (talk) 22:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

You're very welcome! Wish I had a 'more content than I know what to do with' issue! --Ncsjfreed (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)