User talk:Dbabbitt

Welcome
Hello Dave, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.

Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;
 * How to edit a page
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

If you have any questions, see the help pages or add another question to the village pump. Angela 01:32, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Hi :) I'm afraid you can't copy and paste content from the web into the Wikipedia, that's a copyright violation... As a result I've listed Redwall on Votes for deletion/copyvio. If you like, you should write the article in your own words so it doesn't use copied content.

Thanks! :) Dysprosia

Please note that Wikipedia is not a genealogical dictionary. I feel your entry on Babbitt is therefore inappropriate. Please discuss the issue on Votes for deletion if you feel otherwise. Angela 02:27, Sep 12, 2003 (UTC)

Please don't overload the sandbox - the addition made the sandbox blow out to 98k, which is really large for when people want to try out Wiki editing they'll have to wait for all the stuff to load.

If you like, you can make a personal sandbox. For your convenience, here is a link that'll do it for you: User:Dbabbitt/Sandbox

Thanks Dysprosia 03:05, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Concerning the "49 virtues" which you added to the Virtue article.

May I ask - did you just happen to think of an arbitrary 49 yourself or can you cite some published reference?

Are the 49 virtues defined by a particular movement or school of christian theology or ethics? If so, then can I suggest that it might actually be a good idea to create an article dedicated to that particular school or movement and put all the related contributions there.

Without wanting to be too critical, it would seem a better approach than the one you have taken. For example, it is not clear to me that an article describing flexibility requires any discussion of it as a 'virtue', christian or otherwise - a simple dictionary definition of the word would suffice.

Please note this is just my personal point of view. I have no authority here. However, you should be aware that some of your contributions have been listed on Cleanup by more than one user. Peter Manchester 17:07, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC) See also discussion on Talk:Virtue Peter Manchester 23:29, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

authoritarian gov rationing Hubbert peak
I modified your change on the Hubbert peak article and removed "authoritarian goveverment" as all types of government can ration energy, do you agree? Even the U.S. rationed gasoline in the early 1970s. A known troll has come along and reverted my change, if you agree with the change I made to your edit can you be the one that cleans up the mess left by this troll? If so, thx zen master   T  04:32, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * You seem to be at the same time narrowly defining what an authoritarian government is and broadly defining what a troll is. Any government that tries to help society as a whole and only incidentally help the individual is authoritarian in that respect. Even the U.S. in the early 1970s. Labeling someone a troll I find mildly offensive. Didn't he also refer to you as a troll? Your self-defensiveness is also mildly offensive. I'm just mildly offended today. :-) --Dbabbitt 01:47, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Your user page
I just reverted some changes from an IP after reviewing history and noting that it's been reverted several times thus far. I just hope it's not you editing from an IP! (If it is, feel free to tell me to sod off.) Tony Fox 18:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * This is just weird. It looks like the IP, which has vandalized before, is trying to redesign the whole page. *confused* Tony Fox 18:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No it's definitely someone other than me trying to vandalize my user page. Thanx for looking out for me. --Dbabbitt 23:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Knights of Columbus
Hi! Thanks for voting for the Knights of Columbus on the Catholic Collaboration page! I know that it is not the CCW article for a few weeks, but right now it is up for FAC so if you could see your way over there early that would be great. Right now the only person holding out on supporting it has a complaint about the prose, so copyediting would be particularly helpful. Thanks again! --Briancua 14:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Hi there, I don't understand what you mean, I mark pages for speedy deletion etc when I see them and think it is appropriate. Please help, I don't understand where you think I'm going wrong? can you tell me in more detail and I'll do my best to work on it. Telly addict  15:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks like, from your talk page, that you have deleted the changes of three people merely because they have neglected to log in before making the edits. Is there more to it than that? --Dbabbitt 15:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
Look at just like to say that I'm really sorry, I don't want this to turn in to a dispute because I believe that Wikipedia is a friendly place and I'd just like to thank you for bringing these matters to my attention and that I hope we can put thus behind us and be friends. Thanks for bringing it to my attention and happy editing. I don't fully understand what you mean, you'll have to expalin it a little more. please reply on my talk page though. I dont understand what you mean, please explain it in more detail as I have already asked.

Respectfully... Telly addict  16:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * What are you doing to bring your personal reverting policy more in line with Wikipedia's Avoidance policy? Please answer my question "as I have already asked".

BABS!!
Where the hell are you ? Are you still at the Knights? If not why did you leave ? Fill me in would ya.
 * Hi Doug! I'm still working at KofC, but I'm looking to leave any time, because they don't have any more ColdFusion for me to work on.
 * I'm still working at KofC, but I'm working from home. I also have other clients which allow me to work (mostly) from home.
 * I'm not working from home anymore, and am coding almost exclusively in Java.

--dbabbitt (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Template:Chess diagram
What was the reason for your edit to Template:Chess diagram? See WT:CHESS. Quale (talk) 05:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't intentional. -Dbabbitt (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Your sandbox
Hi there! Why does your sandbox have so many tags? It may cause problems for people attempting to clean up the corresponding categories. - Samuel  Tan  13:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Tally marks image
Hi Dbabbitt,

I've uploaded a new version of Image:Tally marks-Five-bar Gate.svg that comes more directly from Image:Tally marks.svg. Since the image is an SVG, the "nominal size" is really irrelevant; you can scale it to any size you'd like. For example, here's the image at 24 pixels high:. Hope this helps! --bdesham ★  14:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to ARS!
{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; " align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron!
 * colspan="2" |

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!

File:Dbabbitt.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Dbabbitt.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Hi, My article about "Imran Channa Visual Artist " is considered for delition, Imran Channa is the well known contemporary Pakistani artist. i have given all the links and sources. I m also an artist and a new user of wikipedia, my task is to creates articles on art & artists of pakistan , because there is no material available on wikipedia on pakistani art & artist so that art historians and students from all over the world can get some sort of information, so plz could u help me out to add my 1st article of Imran Channa. Thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Art wart1234 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Political Ideologies.png
Thanks for uploading File:Political Ideologies.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:US Political Parties.png
Thanks for uploading File:US Political Parties.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:19, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Ways to improve Orders of magnitude (energy flow density)
Hi, I'm Gareth E Kegg. Dbabbitt, thanks for creating Orders of magnitude (energy flow density)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The main article energy flow densities has not been created!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Counter-IED efforts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IED (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soy protein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chronic fatigue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Counter-IED efforts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Department of Defense and Department of Justice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Counter-IED efforts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Component analysis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fully Automated Business Entity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distributed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=583251673 your edit] to Decentralized Autonomous Corporation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * has the responsibility of maintaining a balance in some cryptographic money like Bitcoin, and sending and receiving transactions. It also handles non-self-verifying time

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Decentralized Autonomous Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ripple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Decentralized Autonomous Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ripple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Rescuing your DAC article
Hi! FYI: I started http://coinwiki.info/ yesterday and was about to start an article on DACs. Fortunately I found your excellent article here, but I also noticed it might be deleted. I made a quick copy to http://coinwiki.info/en/Decentralized_autonomous_corporation just in case. (In case you're wondering, I've been disappointed in bitcoin.it and I've started many wikis before, some of those have become quite successful :) Guaka (talk) 18:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think their $10-USD-to-get-started model leaves something to be desired. Thanx for picking me up! Since the article I wrote here is mostly an original synthesis, I'm going to publish it for a journal and was looking forward to the deletion, so I could reintroduce it with my journal article as a reference. (I wonder how the fact that you've made a copy of it is going to effect that. :-)

Speedy deletion nomination of Distributed Autonomous Corporation
Hello Dbabbitt,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Distributed Autonomous Corporation for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:53, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Distributed autonomous corporation
Hello Dbabbitt,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Distributed autonomous corporation for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Decentralized autonomous corporation
Hello Dbabbitt,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Decentralized autonomous corporation for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Distributed Autonomous Organization was accepted
 Distributed Autonomous Organization, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Fiddle  Faddle  12:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Dbabbitt help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Decentralized Autonomous Organization, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tor and Blockchain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Decentralized autonomous organization


The article Decentralized autonomous organization has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No real evidence of notability. Appears to be largely original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Snowded TALK 12:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Decentralized autonomous organization
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Decentralized autonomous organization&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

JavaScript RegExp problem
I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Redwall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redwall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Redwall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 19:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Orders of magnitude (specific energy) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orders of magnitude (specific energy) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Orders of magnitude (specific energy) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#x222F; WBG converse 06:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Orders of magnitude (energy flow density) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orders of magnitude (energy flow density) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Orders of magnitude (energy flow density) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  Newslinger  talk   10:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)