User talk:Dbeat87/sandbox

Dbeat87's Peer Review Notes

 * Had very good information in the article, very well thought out and mostly neutral, stays on topic.
 * Organized and stays on topic, uses many different sources which makes for a well rounded use of sources, balancing different points of view.
 * The table of contents was well organized and great, but if I can suggest something, the table of contents can be added in without typing it from scratch. To do this, make 5 or more headings and save. From there, you should see the table of contents pop up so when you click on any of the table of content's headings, it redirects you to the heading without scrolling (I hope this didn't sound mean or anything! Great first draft!).
 * Never goes off topic,and what impresses me most is how the section transitions smoothly.
 * The information stays within the realm of the heading that it is in, and doesn't jump to another heading's topic.
 * There were some minor parts that were not so neutral like saying "many believed", which could be leaning to a specific view point instead of neutral.
 * All the citations are neutral viewpoints.
 * Overall, Great article!--MartyRamirez10 (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)