User talk:Dberke220

In order to be transparent, this user has created a new account: User:Meredith at DBA please leave messages at that talk page. Thank you.

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Dberke220/sandbox2 has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sandbox2, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 10:17pm • 12:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 1:01pm • 03:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Deborah Berke & Partners, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! mabdul 19:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen (Dberke220) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Deborah Berke & Partners Architects. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * It doesn't appear that you read the above, or the pages it links to, so I'll try again.
 * I'm making the assumption that an editor with the name User:Dberke220, who has only ever edited the Deborah Berke & Partners Architects, is affiliated with the firm. Is that correct? If so, I recommend in the strongest possible fashion that you read up on how Wikipedia views Conflict of Interest. In particular, you need to read:
 * Guidelines (What are guidelines?)
 * Conflict of interest
 * FAQ/Organizations
 * Essays (What are essays?)
 * Suggestions for COI compliance
 * Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest
 * Not a noticeboard
 * Writing about subjects close to you (part of a larger essay: On notability)
 * The short version: it's recommended that you not edit Deborah Berke & Partners Architects. If there are changes you wish made, suggest them on the talk page, and let someone else—someone unaffiliated with the firm—make the edits. But I really recommend that you read the links, and if at all possible, before you revert the article again.


 * And btw, in response to :
 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Deborah Berke & Partners Architects. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Or, in other words: No, it is not your article. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 04:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Deborah Berke & Partners Architects, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 04:04, 9 May 2012 (UTC)