User talk:Dberks

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Toy & Game Group (July 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 Talk Work 15:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group. Thanks!  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  05:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Toy & Game Group (August 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group. Thanks!  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  17:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Toy & Game Week (June 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by In Memoriam A.H.H. was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Week and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Week, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chicago_Toy_%26_Game_Week Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:In_Memoriam_A.H.H.&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chicago_Toy_%26_Game_Week reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

In Memoriam A.H.H. What, you egg?. 18:07, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your comments at my talk page.
Hi there Dberks. You stated at my talk page to outline which of the prose to change. I would suggest rewriting the Star Wars Luncheon section, reword the lead on the Toy and Game Innovation Awards, and also reword the Conferences section. However, even if you reword everything I said. You still have not shown that the event is notable enough to have an article dedicated to its self. You can do that by implementing good reliable secondary sources into the article before submission, such as a well-published newspaper, or a well-known reliable news website. Please refer to WP:RSE for help. Have a nice day. In Memoriam A.H.H. What, you egg?. 16:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)