User talk:Dbraem

Atlas Shrugged: Part II
Anon reverted your contribution to this article, but if he hadn't, I would have. What you did is insert a paragraph of your own opinion, which is never appropriate on Wikipedia.

Regarding the opinion itself, you suggest that not just the content of Part II but the manner of producing Part II should have been done in harmony with Ayn Rand's values. There is no such rule nor courtesy! The producers as well as the actors have earned their keep and are entitled to as much personal gain as they can negotiate with willing counterparts. I too was disappointed at the sequel's use of a new cast--and was much less interested in seeing the world through Samantha Mathis's eyes than I had been with Taylor Schilling. However, as the article states, the value of Schilling's services has increased since Part I, and the expectation that the sequel would make a profit has decreased. To assert that, despite these changes in market conditions, Schilling et al. have some sort of entitlement to employment in Parts II and III is not a claim Rand would ever have made. Spike-from-NH (talk) 12:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)