User talk:Dbranda

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Since you have had time to review our policies on WP:Advert and WP:COI, what articles do you plan to edit if you are unblocked? Toddst1 (talk) 22:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have read policies on WP:Advert and WP:COI, and there is absolutely no conflict of interest when a page exists before my employment, the integrity of that page is severely altered and degraded by a person working for our political opponents, and the only edits I do are to restore the original content. dbranda talk 9:11, 11 May 2010
 * I looked at your request, and while I decided not to unblock, I left the request open for others to review. Your statement that "there is absolutely no conflict of interest" for you indicates that either you have not yet read the conflict of interest guidelines, or you didn't fully understand them, and that makes me reluctant to unblock you- this is a delicate operation, and replacing an anti-Ball article with a pro-Ball article is not as useful as having someone create a neutral article would be.  I can't justify unblocking you in this situation, knowing that you don't understand the rules for a person in your position. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I see that you've created User:Coombsdm to avoid your block. I'm afraid that avoiding a block in this way is also against the rules, and will reflect badly on you as you work to help neutral editors create a neutral version of this article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Please contact User:Coombsdm via email, and he will provide you with contact information, as will I if you email me, to substantiate that we are both who we say we are, and that his intentions are true. The original article that I restored in March and that he just restored was substantially written by a wikipedia admin. It's not a question of replacing pro-Ball versus anti-Ball.dbranda talk 10:11, 11 May 2010