User talk:Dc-ijc

License tagging for Image:Mucho$.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mucho$.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 08:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! frummer 02:13, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

AMA Requests: Kahanism
I would like to volunteer to take your case, unless someone else is already working on it. Walton monarchist89 11:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the offer. Yours is the first offer of advocacy. Things seem to have calmed down, at least for now. But do take a look at the discussion page for the article.


 * OK, having examined the article and the discussion page, it seems like there's a lot of disputed and uncited material in the article. I'm not personally an expert on Kahanism (having never heard of it before taking this case), but I do know that the way to achieve compromise on Wikipedia is always to provide sources. So if you back up everything you say with sources, other users cannot reasonably prevent you putting it on the page. If you tell me (preferably on my AMA desk) exactly how you think the article should be modified, I will contact the other users involved in the dispute and attempt to negotiate a compromise. Remember, provide sources for everything. Walton monarchist89 09:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree that the first paragraph needs work to provide adequate sources. Having done a little reading around the topic (as this isn't something I had any knowledge about), it looks like the page on Kach has a lot of related and sourced information about the different Kahanist groups - perhaps it would be advisable to duplicate some of this in the Kahanism article. As to the list of Kahanist websites at the end, I understand that it may seem a little worrying that terrorist groups' website links may be included - but remember that Wikipedia isn't here to condemn extremist groups (however dangerous they may be), but to provide a neutral source of information. As such, rather than deleting those links, I'd suggest you add some links to sites that are critical of Kahanism, in order to provide more balance - I agree with you that it's not good to have eight pro-Kahanist sites and no anti-Kahanist sites in the links section. Walton monarchist89 16:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Since the dispute appears to have calmed down, can we officially close this case? Walton monarchist89 18:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Sure, until the next kerfluffle. Thanks for your help.Dc-ijc 06:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Ger toshav
Please don't restore this material again. The source is not reliable. SlimVirgin (talk) 07:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Also Dc-ijc, please be aware you are close to violating the three-revert rule which could result in your being blocked. -- M P er el ( talk 06:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You've been reported for violating 3rr. It's possible you may avert a block by reverting your changes back to the 7:09 version.  Meanwhile you have not answered any of the requests to provide source and relevancy.  A ger toshav is a non-Jew who desires to join the Jewish community and follow Judaism without converting.  Since Israel is not a theocracy, I don't what you think this has to do with the text you keep trying to add which has nothing to do with religion whatsoever. -- M P er el ( talk 08:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

3RR
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. yandman 12:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 04:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

Regarding edits to Kach and Kahane Chai
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Dc-ijc! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 05:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)