User talk:Dcaxew/sandbox

Comment
Wow, Dcaxew, this is quite a bit to chew on. While you could just edit and think through a little more what you have here for posting on the article talk page, when we discuss these in class, let's play with which piece or pieces might be most productive for potential edits to what is currently there. For example, on the basis of Lindemann's work you could maybe add a section on character damage? I look forward to discussing this one more in class as it touches on so many of the topics we have been discussing. --Jbdolphin (talk) 06:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Great ideas! You brought up a lot of good questions. I am excited to see what the paragraphs you add into the wiki page look like. Will you have several new sections? One? I also like that you brought up media, since media has such a big impact on children in our society now. Similarly with stereotypes, this is an important issue that has an impact on children as they grow. My only tip is to make sure you are remaining neutral when adding to wiki, and not using your own knowledge but staying on track with your sources. Great job! -Karly — Preceding unsigned comment added by EthicsForAFreeWorld (talk • contribs) 19:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Good job
I am really interested in your topic. I find it absolutely fascinating! I think you did a really good job!! You have a good lead/evaluation of the article, why you want this article to be reevaluated and how this connects to the other information in this article. In addition, your structure is good; the argument flows really well. Your argument is well written and your conclusion wraps up your argument well. I am trying to find an area to critique but I honestly think what you have is perfect. -CasperCasey — Preceding unsigned comment added by CasperCasey (talk • contribs) 04:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)