User talk:Dcflyer

AfD nomination of Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Institute for End User Computing


A tag has been placed on The Institute for End User Computing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. konetidy (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Mount Hermon Cemetery) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mount Hermon Cemetery.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

An interesting and well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

→

Thank you for your time in reviewing this article, as well as for the feedback that you provided. It is much appreciated. Best, Dcflyer (talk) 16:53, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Deaths in Sillery has been nominated for discussion
Category:Deaths in Sillery, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Births in Sillery has been nominated for discussion
Category:Births in Sillery, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 01:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Edit filter false positives
Hi! One of my edit filters blocked a couple of your edits: this was a false positive, and I've now fixed what I believe to have been the problem. I hope this hasn't inconvenienced you too much. -- The Anome (talk) 12:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit-warring on Mark Levin
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 12:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Please follow WP:BRD. The content you've recently added to the article has been reverted. Seek consensus for its inclusion. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 12:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * After 1-2 weeks of inactivity, you've now started to edit-war your version into the article again without following WP:BRD in any way whatsoever. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring on an article under discretionary sanctions, as you did at Mark Levin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. v/r - TP 23:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your page User talk:Dcflyer/Newsletters
Hi Dcflyer, your page User talk:Dcflyer/Newsletters is somewhat broken, because it is too big. To fix it you could edit it and remove a lot of the old content, it would still be accessible in your history. If there are newletters that you don't read anymore you may also want to unsubscribe from them. Best regards, — xaosflux  Talk 12:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

User talk:Dcflyer/Newsletters
Hello, I have manually archived you talk page User talk:Dcflyer/Newsletters since it was too large to deliver the mass messages that you have signed up to. This was leaving multiple log entries and if you wish to automate this process in order to always recieve messages then you can look at Help:Archiving (plain and simple) & WP:AUTOARCHIVE to start the process. Thanks, Terasail [✉️] 12:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Also, I need your help. I submitted an article on the Baltimore Watercolor Society but it has been deleted due to "not adequately supported by reliable sources." and neutral point of view. I don't see the problem. It has references and seems neutral. User talk:KylieTastic seems rather problematic.

Thanks, Kent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klnorman (talk • contribs) 15:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)