User talk:Dchip12

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tippx (talk) 03:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Tippx, I have been following the edits on Congressman-elect Allen West's article and there is no indication that the claim that you make against Dchip12 above is true. Also, your edits have been disruptive.  Please stop.--Corbridge (talk) 12:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:CIVIL
Be cautious. Even when we disagree, we must always remain polite. Edit summaries like this one reflect badly on you. In addition, be aware of Wikipedia's rules regarding edit-warring. In cases of disagreement, do not continue reverting one another repeatedly, but stop and discuss, and make the agreed-upon changes only after consensus is clear. WP:DISPUTE has some helpful advice on how to deal with deadlocks. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I just noticed this comment, which is a good example of how not to reach consensus with other users. Similar comments in the future are quite likely to result in a block.  Remember, discuss the content, not other editors. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Administrator's Noticeboard /Incidents
Please note that I will not respond to, or read your User talk page. Wikipedia rules mandate that I post this message here. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Tippx (talk) 03:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persisting in personal attacks after being warned about civility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:50, 8 December 2010 (UTC)