User talk:Dciurchea

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Dciurchea! Thank you for your contributions. I am MJ94 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! MJ94 (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

FYI
In case you are not aware creating a new account in an attempt to present yourself as multiple individuals is a blockable offence. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  23:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Dciurchea , I am here because of your WP:ANI complaint (and demand for punishment.) The above note from TRPoD is merely friendly information. You must have made an edit which is very similar to ones made by another editor. You might be the other editor; you might not have even known that socking is not allowed here. TRPoD is simply informing you of the policy, and its consequences; not making any accusations or anything else hostile. If you're not socking, no worries. If you are, now you know. But a friendly notice from TRPoD is not in any way anything anyone is ever going to "punish" anyone for. You need to separate information about policy from accusations or attacks, and be a little more trusting that others are only trying to be informative and help you. Be sure to click the linked words. You may wish to consider editing the Wikipedia for your native language as you have made several errors in English in your ANI posting. Killer Chihuahua 18:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am sorry that I publicly expressed my doubts about an editor who came in from the blue and whose first edit was to offer the same critique on an obscure article. I was not assuming good faith. As a new editor who has no relation to the other editors on the page, please express your personal interpretation and analysis of how the subject of the article meets the notability requirements as expressed in third party reliable sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  22:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Your emails
I have received your emails. I request you keep the discussion here rather than emailing me. Please let me know if you have any further questions or comments, by posting here or on my talk page, or by placing helpme on your user talk page with an explanation of what help you need. Killer Chihuahua 00:44, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Please stop referring to TheRedPenofDoom as a "zombie" - that violates our No personal attacks policy.
 * 2) When you say "Neither your post is friendly or competent" I am afraid I cannot understand your meaning. My intent is to help you, and I am knowledgeable about our policies. I am a Wikipedia editor in good standing, with over 8 years on the project. I am also an administrator, and I assure you my competence in understanding policy is not in question.
 * 3) I don't need your forgiveness regarding my observation regarding your English. While I am pleased to hear you have an "honourable and brilliant career, visible and clearly displayed" you unfortunately do not use English at an expert level. Your mistakes are many and some are serious.
 * 4) I don't need to identify myself to you.
 * 5) "in no way your web site makes any rules in our case." I'm sorry, you are wrong. You must follow the policies here on Wikipedia, or you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia.
 * 6) "I am shure that consequences of allowing personal offences without any ground is harmful for your bussiness and organisation." TheRedPenOfDoom didn't even accuse you of being a sock. He did point you to the policy just in case you were, which an edit of yours made a possibility. He has apologized, although IMO he didn't need to, which was a very gracious gesture on his part. You need to move on now.
 * 7) I could make very little sense at all of your second email, although it seemed to be you presenting your references and/or curriculum vitae, in which I have no interest. I will note that when you demand my references with the comment "Excuses are not accepted." and "Wait for compensations I deserve" I'm concerned you misunderstand the nature of Wikipedia. Your expertise, and mine, are irrelevant. We source things here, we do not assert of our own knowledge.