User talk:Dclemens1971/Archive 1

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971

Thank you for creating St. John's Parish (Quincy, Illinois).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   01:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for creating Church of the Holy Communion (Dallas). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Anglican Network in Europe. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   02:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Richard Lipka. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   04:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for correcting my reversions; didn't see you maintained the correct text on the front end. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * No worries! Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Bishop Seabury Anglican Church. User:Reading Beans, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Reading Beans (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Parish Church of St. Helena. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   12:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Ted Follows (bishop). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   10:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Joni Eareckson Tada
Re: your putting Joni in Category:American Reformed Episcopalians - I'm wondering whether you have evidence that she has belonged to that denomination in recent decades? It would hardly be fair to put her there just because she was brought up and confirmed there, and later expressed apprecation of the pastor who had served her church back then. I think that for some years she was at Grace Community Church, but by 2013 she was a "former member" - see Strange Fire Conference: Joni Eareckson Tada - but was evidently still on good terms with Grace's pastor John MacArthur. In fact in 2006 she had written that she was "a PCA (Presbyterian Church in America) church member now" - see Turning Evil on Its Head, and by 2017 she had been at a PCA congregation for "more than two decades" - see More than inspirational. In the light of this I will reverse your edit unless I hear back from you in the next couple of days. PeterR2 (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Foley Beach
What is your basis for deleting his speaking engagement from November 2020 and corresponding archive.org link with his biography and other featured speakers? Loose canon (talk) 02:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * It lacks context for why it is relevant or significant. For all articles, and BLPs especially, information must not only be sourced; it must have context for why it is included. See WP:CHERRY. Please discuss on Talk:Foley Beach, not here.
 * I also suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:BLPCOI. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on St. Paul's Cathedral (Valparaíso). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Chapel
I didn’t add this drawing because I’m not sure the licensing is correct since it’s an artist rendering with no credit given. Do you think it’s free to use?  APK  whisper in my ear  22:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Since it's been uploaded to Commons, I default to "yes," unless a user wants to challenge the validity of the license. The uploader is listed as "Christendom College" so it would be likely to be a college-owned image uploaded according to the terms of the CC license. Obviously the copyright arrangements between the illustrator, architecture firm and client would be unknown so I would assume the uploader is licensing the image in good faith. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about List of Reformed Theological Seminary people
Hello, Dclemens1971, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Owain.davies, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Reformed Theological Seminary people, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/List of Reformed Theological Seminary people.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 10:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on John Stephens (bishop). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 19:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Sione Uluʻilakepa. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of recipients of the Order of Jamaica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Gregory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Bishop Julio Cesar Martin
Thank you for reverting the false information about my resignation. Most appreciated. Did the Anglican Communion Office ask you to correct that?

Again, thank you. 200.68.170.59 (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * No. I have no affiliation or communication with the Anglican Communion Office or any related body. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi there!
 * The federal Judiciary just gave a sentence that suspends the government opinion that Treviño is the legal representative and Primate based on gross irregularities and violation of canon law in the "election" of Treviño back in 2022. Therefore legally Moreno is the Primate.
 * Where can I send you the backing document?
 * My email jc.martin at hot mail dot com 200.68.169.88 (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * To make a change to the Wikipedia page, we would need independent, reliable, secondary sources -- ideally reporting in news/media outlets -- instead of judicial opinions (which would be original research) or Facebook links. If you have any links you can share, English or Spanish, I will take a look. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Let me ask the lawyer...how to upload the document or create a link... It is not a legal opinion, it is a sentence issued by a federal judge. 2806:2F0:7521:F4E9:5490:7F02:696C:B3D8 (talk) 06:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

MIAX
Thanks so much for taking the time to review these articles in AfD, especially taking the time to disambiguate between the references to the parent company vs. the exchange. I know that must've been nontrivial effort on your part. I've also incorporated the journal article that you identified into the MIAX Pearl article. Cara Wellington (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Participating in AfD is labor-intensive if we do it right! Thanks for the kind words. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Dclemens1971, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:


 * Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
 * If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
 * If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Clarifying copyright for Jeff Johnson finding aid
Hello, thanks for reviewing my Jeff Johnson article. I noticed you deleted a significant chunk of my edits due to copyright violation. I put this on the article's talk page, but the Archives West finding aid is CC0, meaning it is public domain. I added the text back because I do not believe it constitutes a copyright violation on Wikipedia. Mathieulalie (talk) 16:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Mathieulalie I see that now in the endnotes. The article does not follow the WP convention for noting the use of open license material - see instructions here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Adding_open-license_text_to_Wikipedia. Also, I am going to give some time for you or other editors to add more independent, secondary sources, but right now the sources in the article don't support notability for the subject. I would anticipate sending this to Articles for Deletion for a discussion in the next couple weeks if appropriate sources aren't identified. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain what specifically the article needs to achieve notability? According to the Wikipedia notability guidelines for biographies, there must be multiple independent reliable sources. I believe the article meets that standard, as I have included excerpts from his biography on the finding aid and multiple articles about him from independent sources. The only time the article relies on primary sources are in quotes or paraphrased quotes. Mathieulalie (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Mathieulalie Quick walk through the footnotes: 1/5. Oral histories and personal papers are primary sources (Johnson talking about himself), which cannot be used to verify notability. (If someone else wrote the bio of him, then maybe that's different but it would depend on who wrote the bio, and the default conclusion from the site's language is that the bio originated with him.) You can use this to verify uncontroversial facts but not for notability. 2/7. Ballotpedia is a user-generated source and questionable for notability. 3/9. The Stand is non-independent as a publication of the organization Johnson led and thus unusable for validating notability. 6/8. NW Labor Press is the equivalent of a trade publication, which doesn't go toward notability. See WP:TRADES. Only source 10, the News-Tribune piece, constitutes significant, independent, secondary, reliable coverage of Johnson. Some of these sources can be used to verify information, but only one points to notability and we would need to see more like that. Please review WP:GNG and WP:NBIO for more. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying. To clarify about the biography from the finding aid, it was not written by Johnson himself, it was written independently by the staff of the Labor Archives of Washington and University of Washington Special Collections (as was everything else in the finding aid). Does that make it qualify for notability? Mathieulalie (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Likely not. First, the source would need to specify the author. Second, I would question the independence of the anyone at the Labor Archives of Washington as a source for this topic, since the organization that Johnson led is listed as a major funder of the archives and Johnson was himself a director of the organization (https://labor.washington.edu/labor-archives#about). The more I look into this, the less likely this subject can be proven notable using the Labor Archives biographical material. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

2026 Asian Para Games
Hello, Dclemens1971,

I was wondering why you converted this article to a redirect when we also have a valid article at 2026 Asian Games. Are the Para Games somehow less important? That AFD you are basing this decision on occurred 6 years ago and this event is now only 2 years away. Liz Read! Talk! 20:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Are there multiple independent, secondary, reliable sources on it yet? Didn't see any in the 2026 Asian Para Games article (or elsewhere, as I'd expect for an event still two years in the future). I do see those sources for the 2026 Asian Games so it makes sense there's a free-standing article. It would be customary to at least have a discussion on the talk page before reverting a decision made at AfD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft: The Grove, Harrow School
Hi Dclemens1971,

I have a draft thats pending review about a Grade 2 listed building in the UK. Under WP:GEOFEAT, any listed heritage building is notable. I have followed instructions of a previous reviewer to alter the text to be about the building more rather than the boarding house, and he has asked for a second reviewer. Perhaps you can help? Thank you very much, especially for your review of my article Lumina Shanghai. Daftation 🗩 🖉 10:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Articles for deletion/Eugene Stanaland
Reply to your message about WP:NPROF. You said that the student-run paper would not qualify as a notability requirement, but #6 in the specific criteria says otherwise. Am I misinterpreting that? I might be Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 13:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Yoblyblob Number 6 at that link says "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society." That would be university president, which he wasn't? Did you mean to link something else? The governing policy on student-run media is at WP:RSSM, where it says: "However, given their local audience and lack of independence from their student body, student media does not contribute to notability for topics related to home institutions." That is, a student paper cannot be used to say a person at that institution is notable. Hope this is helpful. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft: The Grove, Harrow School
Hi Dclemens,

Another question on the draft again - I've looked through tons of documents now, even paper archaeological reports of the Grove from 1986, I cannot find any accounts on when it is built. According to the listed building entry of the Grove, it shows it is built in the mid 18th century, but according to the documents I am reading, the building is referred as a different building to the original, but it never says what year it was constructed. Should I just go for the listed building entry and say it is built c.1750? Daftation 🗩 🖉 17:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Ive also added a few secondary sources which should push up the notability. I will cite some paper sources later. Daftation</b> <b style="color:white">🗩</b> <b style="color:white">🖉</b> 17:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Date of building for Draft:The Grove, Harrow School
Hi Dclemens,

Thanks for your failed verification tag. I have now found some evidence that the building date is actually unknown, cited in the introduction. I don't know if this is enough for it to be moved to the article space. There is literally nothing out there that tells me the date of construction. Is it possible if you leave a comment this time if it still isn't ready on what needs to be improved? Thanks, and sorry for bothering you about this draft for so long. <b style="color:white">Daftation</b> <b style="color:white">🗩</b> <b style="color:white">🖉</b> 19:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Republishing Draft:American history wars
Hello Dclemens,

I just added substance to the article Draft:American history wars that you removed a few days ago for lack of evidencing. Maybe you could take a look and see if it is sufficient? If there's anything else you want me to change or add, let me know. I didn't remove anything already there, and some of that may need tweaks.

Thanks! User409584302 (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Improve Instead of Nominating For Deletion
I noticed that you nominated Voice Of Life for deletion. Instead of wanting it removed, just improve it... Aikolugbara (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AmericanBankersAssociationLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AmericanBankersAssociationLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of female Anglican bishops, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of New Westminster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 530 B Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Story.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)