User talk:Dcotos/Archive 1

September 2023
Your edit to Hoarding disorder has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Sorry but due to a 2010 takedown request from the puplisher, we are not allowed to reproduce DSM criteria, not even as a quotation. — Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you Diannaa, I was not aware of Wikipedia's policies "Copying text from other sources ", which include not reproducing DSM criteria, even as quotations.  Dcotos (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Centre for Nano and Soft Matter Sciences, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.


 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you Diannaa, for this warm welcome. I am learning the process. Dcotos (talk) 17:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Minor means minor
See WP:MINOR for when to tag your edits as minor. David notMD (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you David notMD, I am still learning the process. Dcotos (talk) 20:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Your edit to Hoarding disorder has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Sorry but due to a 2010 takedown request from the puplisher, we are not allowed to reproduce DSM criteria, not even as a quotation. — Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you Diannaa, I was not aware of Wikipedia's policies "Copying text from other sources ", which include not reproducing DSM criteria, even as quotations.  Dcotos (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dcotos. Thank you for your work on Gorakhri. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * MPGuy2824, Thank you, i have added official indian census references 1, 2 in the article. Dcotos (talk) 18:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Science and Engineering Research Board, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Manipal University and Ashutosh Sharma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centre for Nano and Soft Matter Sciences has been accepted
 Centre for Nano and Soft Matter Sciences, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Centre_for_Nano_and_Soft_Matter_Sciences help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Qcne  (talk)  12:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you Qcne (talk) Dcotos  ( talk ) 00:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of डिजीकवच
Hello Dcotos,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Skynxnex, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, डिजीकवच, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at DigiKavach. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Skynxnex (talk) 00:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Skynxnex Due to a technical glitch during article translation, it occurred, but I am grateful for your prompt action. cheers  Dcotos  ( talk ) 00:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jakham River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Three of Us (2023 film) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Three of Us (2023 film). Thanks! S0091 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Three of Us (2023 film) has been accepted
 Three of Us (2023 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Three_of_Us_(2023_film) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dcotos. Thank you for your work on Three of Us (2023 film). User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 01:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Reception added, thank you Dcotos  ( talk ) 08:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Majuli
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Majuli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johnson524 -- Johnson524 (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Majuli
The article Majuli you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Majuli for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Johnson524 -- Johnson524 (talk) 18:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Small Farmers Agribusiness Consortium


The article Small Farmers Agribusiness Consortium has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not an important article for an English wiki"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnTixic (talk) 11:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @UnTixic I have noted that you prodded several articles before, don't proposed an article for deletion, Just because you think, it is highly disruptive and clearly incorrect, please read the WP:PROD nomination section carefully before proposing. Dcotos  ( talk ) 18:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Dcotos, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created two biographies of Indian women and hope there will be many more. You might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. If you would like others to see your interest in the project, you can sign up under "New registrations" on WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Sure, Thank you @Ipigott  Dcotos  ( talk ) 07:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jewish flag


A tag has been placed on Jewish flag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Tails   Wx  13:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, @Tails Wx I moved that page to draftspace for incubation. Reason(s): no sources so I transferred it as draftify using the MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft tool, and it did some malfunctioning. I believe you should notify the page creator. I attempted to contact the article's creator later, but it appears that user has already been blocked. Dcotos  ( talk ) 15:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Dcotos. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. signed,Rosguill talk 01:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello sir
I hope this messages reaches you well. If you arent too busy, review Ellise. It is part of Women red link to blue. This is the second women red link to blue I have created. The first being Patricia Lamanna. Cheers. Wallclockticking (talk) 08:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi,@Wallclockticking the content does not satisfy the criteria specified in WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. as it has been deleted earlier please submit through WP:AFC.  Dcotos  ( talk ) 18:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Dcotos,Thanks for reviewing my article. Would work on your suggestions.Thanks again.Gardenkur (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Your welcome. Cheers!   Dcotos  ( talk ) 06:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello Dcotos,

Thank you for reviewing 75 Medium Regiment (India). I shall take you suggestions on board and suitably update.

Regards,

. Akash139 (talk) 08:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Akash139 You are welcome, Thank you for your contribution. cheers!  Dcotos  ( talk ) 12:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

FxPro (investment company)
@ This member who nominated this article started accusing me of doing articles for pay. But the participant did not even realize that this is a translation of articles from the German section, including this company FxPro. I translated all the articles from there, once only from the Japanese section.

What should I do in this situation? This article on FxPro was last removed in 2017. Since then, many years have passed and several more interwikis have appeared, including the German wikipedia, the Russian wikipedia and others (I translated it from the German section). Favorite girl68 (talk) 11:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Favorite girl68 FXpro was deleted multiple times in 2009 by Ruslik0   as per G11: Blatant advertising, and again in 2018, 2019.  and again in 2024 even after that you published it with different name, looks like case of WP:CONFLICT,  if you are connected, you should disclose your COI when involved with affected article. even if you are not you should put new article through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly.  Dcotos  ( talk ) 12:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

remember lads, subscribe to PewDiePie
I am not sure why you nominated a redirect for WP:A3 (or why you called that redirect vandalism). &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 19:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, @MJL It happened due to a confusion from my side, Thank you for your correction.  Dcotos  ( talk ) 19:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Margaret Veronica Moses
Hey @Dcotos, I hope you're doing well!

First of all, thanks you for marking as reviewed on Margaret's article. second thing is Margaret's article not an orphan please check again. Thanks you. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Your welcome, article is not connected to any page, please link it.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&namespace=0&hideredirs=1&target=Margaret%20Veronica%20Moses Dcotos  ( talk ) 19:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ohh, Thanks you! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Remember lads, subscribe to PewDiePie
Hi, I would just like to say that I do not think the redirect should be deleted. It is not inappropriate, it is a quote that is familiar to the events. It is no different than redirecting 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence to Anders Behring Breivik because that was the name of his manifesto. Thanks Genberg47 (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi@Genberg47 that has been corrected, it won't be deleted. Thank you.  Dcotos  ( talk ) 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

ANI
To be honest, I don't know if notification is required since you're not the subject of this (you did nothing wrong!), but I've mentioned you at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. Local Variable (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Local Variable No worries at all!, i also found their repetitive page creation with different page names as a case of WP:CONFLICT, advertising, and the user was trying to justify these as being translations from other articles, may be because i reviewed one of article Hilde Dalik created by them, they raised a complaint to me to play innocent game in hope, but you did good job, if there's anything,  I'm here to help!. Thank you  Dcotos  ( talk ) 18:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Dcotos. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – robertsky (talk) 01:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Amber Fort
I am not able to add this source to Amber Fort.-- Siokd (talk) 04:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Siokd (talk) 04:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Siokd Because the article is extended-protected, it can be edit by editors with the extended confirmed user access, which granted automatically to registered users with at least 30 days' and at least 500 edits.  Dcotos  ( talk ) 05:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Rater
You should update to the latest rater... individual Wikiproject assessments are deprecated when the same as the shell's assesment. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @UtherSRG Updating, I was not aware about that. Thank you Dcotos  ( talk ) 18:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Regarding the declination of my article
I would like to know about the mistakes in the article and how to avoid them Tanmoyjit (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Tanmoyjit Draft:Sujit Das biography is long and doesn't have reliable multiple published sources to verify, Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources. Dcotos  ( talk ) 07:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dcotos. Thank you for your work on Dharma Narayan Barma. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Submission declined on 30 April 2024 by Dcotos - Lena Snow
Hello, I would like you to help me.

Can you please explain the difference in notability / quality of my article draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lena_Snow

to this accpeted article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_W%C3%B6lk

Your criticism told me that I miss secondary sources outside the field.

I analyzed the sources of the other article:

1. Source inside the art field - art gallery

2. Source inside the art field - Art blog

3. Source offline

4. Source inside the art field - Art blog

5. Source inside the art field - Art magazine

6. Source inside the art field - artist's own website  - self-reference

7. Source offline

8. Source inside the art field - art gallery

9. Source inside the art field - Art blog

10. Source offline

11. Source offline

12. Source inside the art field - Art blog

So, as you can see, there are no sources outside the art business as well - according to your criteria this article should be denied either.

Please tell me, what you need to match your expectations, so I can bring this article into wikipedia - as the artist I write about is real, internationally published and exhibited since 2020.

This can be proven by 56 sources which are independent of each other. This is a lot for an artist, who is considered as not notable by you, I have to underline.

I cited 56 real online sources - many more than the article about Anne Wölk. I got even more if you need it to proof the authenticity.

Any help or tips are welcome.

Thank you in advance. JEbert68 (talk) 10:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @JEbert68 Most of the sources were not reliable as per WP:BIO to meet Basic criteria, People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Blog, social media sites, PR news are not reliable sources. Happy editing!   Dcotos  ( talk ) 15:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging