User talk:Dcowboys3109

April 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Randall chesler. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. PureRED - Kyle Floyd 02:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Trap Starz Clik
I have nominated Trap Starz Clik, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Trap Starz Clik. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 9Nak (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Cambrasa (talk) 09:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Probation notice
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed is on article probation. Hipocrite (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * ...and in other news, this is a reasonable edit but just to let you know, the folks on that page have been debating this ever since the article was written - how to mention the term "Climategate", where, in what context, whether to make that an alternate title or the main title of the article, etc. You can see some of that debate on the talk page and in the archives of the talk page.  I don't think the issue is really decided, but it's sure generated a lot of talk.  Hope that helps, - Wikidemon (talk) 23:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Warning
You appear to have broken 1RR on an article on 1RR probation. I suggest you go and self revert quickly. --BozMo talk 23:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. There is an edit notice of this probationary measure that appears whenever you edit that article. Your edit here reverted to text added two hours earlier, and your edit here four hours later restored the same text. In accordance with the policy on edit warring, I have blocked you for 24 hours. When this expires, please take care to discuss such issues at Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident or elsewhere at that talkpage. - 2/0 (cont.) 02:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)