User talk:Dcroberts91

June 2016
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Owen Coyle has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello my comments were factually accurate and I am going to restore them.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Owen Coyle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Done, hope you're happy.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Burnley F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

My comments are factually accurate and sourced. My comments will be reinstated. Please stop removing or I will report for being disruptive.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Burnley F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Fenix down (talk) 21:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Your refusal to acknowledge the blatant WP:NPOV issues with your additions indicate either (1) you are trolling or (2) you do not possess the necessary competence to edit Wikipedia. The result is the same for either. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Fenix down (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring--Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.
 * The next block will likely be for indefinite duration.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)