User talk:Dcshank/Archive 14

Editing User talk:Dcshank/Archive 13
Hi,

Please note that you accidentally moved your old talk to the mainspace. You might want to correct that mistake. Travelbird (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Travelbird,
 * I realized when I could not find it. Was going to go looking for it. Taken care of now.  Thanks.  --  :- )   Don  18:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter
Delivered 01:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Pillow Flying Artillery
Regarding your decline of this article at AFC, since when have military units been excluded by WP:NOT? You commented "the Wikipedia is not a collection of facts"; isn't that precisely what the definition of an encyclopaedia actually is?  Spinning Spark  12:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

I gave up on this place over a year a go. Check dates?  :- )  Don  20:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Then you are probably not aware that old abandoned AFC drafts are being mass deleted. Some of us are going through them to see if anything can be salvaged before they get the chop.  I am rescuing about 1 in 8 and moving to mainspace.  That's an awfully high percentage.  I am seeing quite a few declined for invalid reasons, or even no real reason at all and am messaging some of the original reviewers.  Yes, they are years old, but I did check your history before posting here and found you had made some fairly recent edits.
 * I've moved your post back here, I don't think you meant to post on my talk page in any case. If you did, the talkback message was completely redundant (and I hate those things anyway.)  Spinning  Spark  21:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello Dcshank! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Winchinchala Winchinchala, (von der Vogelweide) author for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winchinchala Winchinchala, (von der Vogelweide) author is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Winchinchala Winchinchala, (von der Vogelweide) author until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Pratigya
Hi DCshank I had requested for a deleted article to be reinstated, ( link to history of article-https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Pratigya&action=history) you had declined stating notability issues. Wanted to understand how to improve the notability- for it is not very different from some articles like the following :- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratigya and if you do a google search on Pratigya 1975- here is what you get :- (https://www.google.co.in/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=RnjjU4ipI6rV8gfz94DgDg&gws_rd=ssl#q=pratigya+1975) The movie was one of the top 3 grossers in India in 1975 :-(http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=181&catName=MTk3NQ==) all it's cast are notable, it's a movie for an era and a part of the world when you would not have too many online articles, and less notable movies of the same era with the same number of external links do have article online ( and rightly so). Do guide and help in getting this article back. Haphar (talk) 13:16, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Haphar,
 * It appear that the article has been resubmitted. I'm not working here any longer, but I'm sure a reviewer will get to it shortly.  Thanks for your input.  :- )   Don  20:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Bunraku
Is bunraku specifically part of the uncanny valley where other puppets aren't? The uncanny valley article doesn't appear to mention this; it looked like it just had a lot of possible-WP:OR "and here's another robot/puppet/doll that gives me the creeps" links in the see-also section. --McGeddon (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Bunraku is not part of the article. It is in the thumbnail which is reliable, IMHO. I assume that bunraku was chosen as a good general/generic example, rather than some one-off robot built as a university project.  My idea of "other" puppets would be Kermit. --  :- )   Don  15:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, got it, I was just doing a text search. Do we know whether it's an important part of the theory, or just an arbitrary example of a largish puppet with no visible operator? --McGeddon (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know, I just assumed it was a good example. Since there was no wiki-link to bunraku in the Uncanny Valley article, and I did not want to do any editing to the article, the "See Also" would be like "What links here".  I don't think it's any big deal if it's there or not.
 * Regards,  :- )  Don  16:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)