User talk:Dd-605

Welcome!
Hello, Dd-605, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2014
Please don't make changes without including references to reliable sources and without providing an edit summary to explain the change. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at British Armed Forces‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British Armed Forces, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 18:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to British Armed Forces
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British Armed Forces, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boris Johnson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boris Johnson was changed by Dd-605 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961314 on 2014-12-15T00:21:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

British Armed Forces
The Volunteer Reserves are a military reserve force they are not active military. The Active military consists purely of Regulars and Gurkha's. Antiochus the Great (talk) 18:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British Armed Forces. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. ''Why do you continue to make unsourced or unexplained changes to the article? I see in the above warnings you have been doing the same thing for quite some time.'' Antiochus the Great (talk) 19:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on British Armed Forces. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Week for Repeated addition of unreferenced data and WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 22:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. - Have you learned nothing from your previous block? --David Biddulph (talk) 00:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)